Arizona is not better than Boise or Illinois

Auburndawg

New Fish
Another game we should win, especially at home. We have to wait one more week to see if this team is really any better than Sark's first four.

Even then, no one win is going to "prove" anything. We beat Stanford last year, then got routed by Arizona and choked against WSU and Boise.
 
If you can't see this is the same team as 2010, even PLSS Can't help you. Maybe we need to wait a couple more years to see if sark is actually an average coach.
 
Dunno if Zona is better than BSU or Illy, but they proved last season they are way better than us.

They had a very good QB last year. He graduated. We played them down there last year.

Their defense and running game are both better this year, both definitely better than anything the Huskies have seen so far. Huskies are currently 7 point favorites and should win the game, but it could just as likely go the other way. LIFPO
 
U-Mad.gif
 
Based on what? They have played no one.

Based on what? Arizona has one of the best RB's in the country you piece of shit. They definitely have a better running game then Boise or Illinois. Do you ever know what the fuck you are talking about?

 
Last edited:
Dunno if Zona is better than BSU or Illy, but they proved last season they are way better than us.

They had a very good QB last year. He graduated. We played them down there last year.

Yes,Tucson is always a tough place to play. Big, aggressive, loud crowds, 2,500 ft elevation, night game etc. Understandable that all of that is worth 50 points.
 
UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.
 
Last edited:
Has Sark's mythical great recruiting that doesn't include linemen really made UW better than AU? Who develops it better? What will iDawg say when Zona hangs 50?
 
UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.

This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.
 
UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.

This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.

As a Duck fan, I can honestly say that this is the best Husky team I have seen in the Sark era. You have great speed and terrific tacklers on the backside of the defense.

On the offensive side of the ball:
You have more speed than ever
Your receivers can now catch the football
Sark has now copied an offensive strategy that hides the team's one glaring weakness which is pass blocking.

Washington football is better now than it has been in years, but don't get me wrong. Although great lipstick, it's still lipstick over a very mediocre pig, which is magnetized by the ineptitude of your head coach. This team will do better than 7-6, but when playing against better talent they will get destroyed. There will be some bleeding buttholes post-game of the Oregon, Stanford, and UCLA games. This team could go 10-3 this year, but the separation between this program and the top tier will still be huge.

10-3 with 3 plungers will feel like a Northwestern like 10-3. Nobody will really think much about it, from a national perspective.
 
Last edited:
UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.

This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.

As a Duck fan, I can honestly say that this is the best Husky team I have seen in the Sark era. You have great speed and terrific tacklers on the backside of the defense.

On the offensive side of the ball:
You have more speed than ever
Your receivers can now catch the football
Sark has now copied an offensive strategy that hides the team's one glaring weakness which is pass blocking.

Washington football is better now than it has been in years, but don't get me wrong. Although great lipstick, it's still lipstick over a very mediocre pig, which is magnetized by the ineptitude of your head coach. This team will do better than 7-6, but when playing against better talent they will get destroyed. There will be some bleeding buttholes post-game of the Oregon, Stanford, and UCLA games. This team could go 10-3 this year, but the separation between this program and the top tier will still be huge.

10-3 with 3 plungers will feel like a Northwestern like 10-3. Nobody will really think much about it, from a national perspective.

Doogs would never stop singing Sark's praises after that scenario.
 
If Arizona is so good, how can you expect Sark to win?

I expect Sark to win and win comfortably on Saturday. If he doesn't I am going to be pissed.
 
If Arizona is so good, how can you expect Sark to win?

I expect Sark to win and win comfortably on Saturday. If he doesn't I am going to be pissed.

I always expect a win. That's why i hate sark, he disappoints me at least 6 times a year.
 
Back
Top