Apparently using 5-4 conference record and lack of improvement is not a valid argument

[DugtheDoog]

I learned today that when discussing Dude Brah, referencing his 5-4 conference record in year 5 and barely .500 record vs Div. 1 means that you don't know anything about football and don't have a valid reason to dislike him as coach of your team.

For fuck's sake, these people amaze me everyday how FS they really are. I feel like I'm living in bizarre-o world when using statistics and win/loss records does not make a valid argument. What makes a valid argument is how you feel and how much you like dude brah's dance contests and rap music. Kind of reminds me of the Stanford referee...whether the ball hit the ground or not is irrelevant, the replay official had no way to feel the emotion on the field to make that kind of call.

FYFMFE.

 

[[Deleted User]]

I love when I would say all these things and my Doog friends would always go "You just don't like Sark and want him to fail so you can be right. You are actually happy that UW isn't very good and just a negative person. At least in my life I'm positive. Whether UW wins or loses I'm happy that my life is doing well" and no my friend isn't Alex Akita who also says the same dumb crap.

I love how they ALWAYS turn the argument from Sark is a bad coach to you must live a miserable and pathetic life. That's when you know the coach fucking sucks is when they can't counter your points they have to resort to you must live a miserable life and are always so negative.

I tried explaining the 5-4 to a bunch of Doogs a day after the Apple Cup when they wanted him extended. They were like Sark can't help it the conference just got tougher over time. I was like but how? ASU, UCLA made coaching changes, Sark came in same year as Kelly at Oregon, I was like USC just fired their coach this year and finished higher than us, AZ is on par with us and have a new coach.

Then the usual "But they didn't have to take over 0-12. Sark inherited the toughest job in the NCAA with 0-12". Doogs hate facts I know water is wet but fuck I'm shocked they can hold down a job with lacking that much logic and reason.

 

[Gladstone]

The MykFS Malaise: ignore glaring W-L statistics and cite obscure, irrelevant data to justify continued mediocrity

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

I love when I would say all these things and my Doog friends would always go "You just don't like Sark and want him to fail so you can be right. You are actually happy that UW isn't very good and just a negative person. At least in my life I'm positive. Whether UW wins or loses I'm happy that my life is doing well" and no my friend isn't Alex Akita who also says the same dumb crap.

I love how they ALWAYS turn the argument from Sark is a bad coach to you must live a miserable and pathetic life. That's when you know the coach fucking sucks is when they can't counter your points they have to resort to you must live a miserable life and are always so negative.

I tried explaining the 5-4 to a bunch of Doogs a day after the Apple Cup when they wanted him extended. They were like Sark can't help it the conference just got tougher over time. I was like but how? ASU, UCLA made coaching changes, Sark came in same year as Kelly at Oregon, I was like USC just fired their coach this year and finished higher than us, AZ is on par with us and have a new coach.

Then the usual "But they didn't have to take over 0-12. Sark inherited the toughest job in the NCAA with 0-12". Doogs hate facts I know water is wet but fuck I'm shocked they can hold down a job with lacking that much logic and reason.

You got it. The two main Doogs I know have pulled this crap before. One bible thumper pulled the "I have insider access and I know what the boosters think" garbage, then once had the audacity to say I shouldn't be a fan because I'm too negative. Why would anyone be negative after winning 35% of your games over a decade?!

The other one just tells me to calm down when I go off in Sark like I'm 7 years old. He thought Ty needed a fourth year.

 

[DugtheDoog]

Then the usual "But they didn't have to take over 0-12. Sark inherited the toughest job in the NCAA with 0-12". Doogs hate facts I know water is wet but fuck I'm shocked they can hold down a job with lacking that much logic and reason.

I've said it before, and I think I've said it to you, that what side of coin you're on is a fairly good indicator of how successful you are at life. If you're a halfbrain/HH type thinker, you live in reality, have high expectations for yourself and those around you and are generally a smart relatively successful person. If you subscribe to the doog philosiphy, facts don't matter, it's all about feelings and emotion. Because of this, results are not that important and which is why shift manager checker at Safeway (5-4) is a great gig.

 

[[Deleted User]]

I love when I would say all these things and my Doog friends would always go "You just don't like Sark and want him to fail so you can be right. You are actually happy that UW isn't very good and just a negative person. At least in my life I'm positive. Whether UW wins or loses I'm happy that my life is doing well" and no my friend isn't Alex Akita who also says the same dumb crap.

I love how they ALWAYS turn the argument from Sark is a bad coach to you must live a miserable and pathetic life. That's when you know the coach fucking sucks is when they can't counter your points they have to resort to you must live a miserable life and are always so negative.

I tried explaining the 5-4 to a bunch of Doogs a day after the Apple Cup when they wanted him extended. They were like Sark can't help it the conference just got tougher over time. I was like but how? ASU, UCLA made coaching changes, Sark came in same year as Kelly at Oregon, I was like USC just fired their coach this year and finished higher than us, AZ is on par with us and have a new coach.

Then the usual "But they didn't have to take over 0-12. Sark inherited the toughest job in the NCAA with 0-12". Doogs hate facts I know water is wet but fuck I'm shocked they can hold down a job with lacking that much logic and reason.

You got it. The two main Doogs I know have pulled this crap before. One bible thumper pulled the "I have insider access and I know what the boosters think" garbage, then once had the audacity to say I shouldn't be a fan because I'm too negative. Why would anyone be negative after winning 35% of your games over a decade?!

The other one just tells me to calm down when I go off in Sark like I'm 7 years old. He thought Ty needed a fourth year.

All those Sark supporters I know personally were Tybots as well. The ones on the internet I don't know for sure if they were Tybots but they sure as fuck dress like one so I'm guessing they were as well.

I won't let these cunts forget it when Petersen wins. I'll remind them how they called me a moron for saying UW could improve their coach, how Sark was holding the program back, how you can win right off the bat and that it doesn't take a god damn 10 year plan and how it's refreshing to have a coach who doesn't act like a total buffoon off the field.

It was hilarious when one Doog friend was with me along with a former captain of Sark's. That captain was shitting on Sark badly and he was so quiet. After the meeting he was like well player X was just bitter you can't take the opinion of one guy as the be all. Which is hilarious because the media portrayed the players as loving Sark so for years I'd hear "Well the players love Sark and they are there every day unlike you."

 

[RoadDawg55]

I love when I would say all these things and my Doog friends would always go "You just don't like Sark and want him to fail so you can be right. You are actually happy that UW isn't very good and just a negative person. At least in my life I'm positive. Whether UW wins or loses I'm happy that my life is doing well" and no my friend isn't Alex Akita who also says the same dumb crap.

I love how they ALWAYS turn the argument from Sark is a bad coach to you must live a miserable and pathetic life. That's when you know the coach fucking sucks is when they can't counter your points they have to resort to you must live a miserable life and are always so negative.

I can't stand the doogs who act like getting upset about shitty football means you have a miserable and pathetic life. It's most ironic when Fetters and Kim say it. I vent about shitty football on an internet message board and get the fuck on with things. I don't even talk about UW football where I live very often because no one really cares.

The only time I was legitimately angry was after the Stanford game, and I drank a ton of booze during that game. In the fairness of full disclosure, I did want to reach through my computer and slap the shit out of AuburnDoog for saying Van Winkle being injured explained a lot. I doubt anyone sits around all week and treats everyone around them like shit because UW lost a game.

 

[DugtheDoog]

I love when I would say all these things and my Doog friends would always go "You just don't like Sark and want him to fail so you can be right. You are actually happy that UW isn't very good and just a negative person. At least in my life I'm positive. Whether UW wins or loses I'm happy that my life is doing well" and no my friend isn't Alex Akita who also says the same dumb crap.

I love how they ALWAYS turn the argument from Sark is a bad coach to you must live a miserable and pathetic life. That's when you know the coach fucking sucks is when they can't counter your points they have to resort to you must live a miserable life and are always so negative.

I can't stand the doogs who act like getting upset about shitty football means you have a miserable and pathetic life. It's most ironic when Fetters and Kim say it. I vent about shitty football on an internet message board and get the fuck on with things. I don't even talk about UW football where I live very often because no one really cares.

The only time I was legitimately angry was after the Stanford game, and I drank a ton of booze during that game. In the fairness of full disclosure, I did want to reach through my computer and slap the shit out of AuburnDoog for saying Van Winkle being injured explained a lot. I doubt anyone sits around all week and treats everyone around them like shit because UW lost a game.

Which is ironic because F3 and Griswold treat paying customers like shit, live a miserable and pathetic life and don't give a fuck if the Huskies win or lose.

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Then the usual "But they didn't have to take over 0-12. Sark inherited the toughest job in the NCAA with 0-12". Doogs hate facts I know water is wet but fuck I'm shocked they can hold down a job with lacking that much logic and reason.

I've said it before, and I think I've said it to you, that what side of coin you're on is a fairly good indicator of how successful you are at life. If you're a halfbrain/HH type thinker, you live in reality, have high expectations for yourself and those around you and are generally a smart relatively successful person. If you subscribe to the doog philosiphy, facts don't matter, it's all about feelings and emotion. Because of this, results are not that important and which is why shift manager checker at Safeway (5-4) is a great gig.

There are exceptions, but Doogs generally just aren't that intelligent. Think about it. In the media you have Softy, Elise etc.

The hardcore online ones are Krisvashon, 14afs, Supercanuck etc., then there are the Twatter and Softy FB guys who fly off the handle at facts. They love to divert and call halfbrains negative and dispute their fanhood because they rarely have facts.

 

[MikeDamone]

But how is sark a mediocre coach?

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

I love when I would say all these things and my Doog friends would always go "You just don't like Sark and want him to fail so you can be right. You are actually happy that UW isn't very good and just a negative person. At least in my life I'm positive. Whether UW wins or loses I'm happy that my life is doing well" and no my friend isn't Alex Akita who also says the same dumb crap.

I love how they ALWAYS turn the argument from Sark is a bad coach to you must live a miserable and pathetic life. That's when you know the coach fucking sucks is when they can't counter your points they have to resort to you must live a miserable life and are always so negative.

I can't stand the doogs who act like getting upset about shitty football means you have a miserable and pathetic life. It's most ironic when Fetters and Kim say it. I vent about shitty football on an internet message board and get the fuck on with things. I don't even talk about UW football where I live very often because no one really cares.

The only time I was legitimately angry was after the Stanford game, and I drank a ton of booze during that game. In the fairness of full disclosure, I did want to reach through my computer and slap the shit out of AuburnDoog for saying Van Winkle being injured explained a lot. I doubt anyone sits around all week and treats everyone around them like shit because UW lost a game.

Disagree.

 

[topdawgnc]

Couple of things you miserable assholes forget.

0-12 ...

Ty Willingham ...

And ...

Don't forget Sark beat Peterman!

 

[whlinder]

I will never understand the lengths those losers go to defending someone who made $2mil? per year from UW.

Like he was some fucking miracle worker for taking a 200%+ pay raise to take over a team with Jack Lockner, Donald Butler, Mason Foster et al? NO ONE else in all of college football could have possible managed to go 5-7, 7-6, 7-6, 7-6, 8-4 with that salary scale?

What a fucking sacrifice he made by coming here, but doogs top it off by thanking him after getting anally raped

 

[[Deleted User]]

Then the usual "But they didn't have to take over 0-12. Sark inherited the toughest job in the NCAA with 0-12". Doogs hate facts I know water is wet but fuck I'm shocked they can hold down a job with lacking that much logic and reason.

I've said it before, and I think I've said it to you, that what side of coin you're on is a fairly good indicator of how successful you are at life. If you're a halfbrain/HH type thinker, you live in reality, have high expectations for yourself and those around you and are generally a smart relatively successful person. If you subscribe to the doog philosiphy, facts don't matter, it's all about feelings and emotion. Because of this, results are not that important and which is why shift manager checker at Safeway (5-4) is a great gig.

There are exceptions, but Doogs generally just aren't that intelligent. Think about it. In the media you have Softy, Elise etc.

The hardcore online ones are Krisvashon, 14afs, Supercanuck etc., then there are the Twatter and Softy FB guys who fly off the handle at facts. They love to divert and call halfbrains negative and dispute their fanhood because they rarely have facts.

Without fail every time you see one of Softy's mouth breathers they always work some shitty job where they are lucky to make $15 an hour and have some bullshit CC school attached to them.

I think Krisvashon is actually fucking retarded.

 

[Tequilla]

I love when I would say all these things and my Doog friends would always go "You just don't like Sark and want him to fail so you can be right. You are actually happy that UW isn't very good and just a negative person. At least in my life I'm positive. Whether UW wins or loses I'm happy that my life is doing well" and no my friend isn't Alex Akita who also says the same dumb crap.

Sounds to me like you need new friends