Another Pre-Season Analytic Projection

Lastly, the 2019 conference comparison:

View attachment 2139
View attachment 2140
View attachment 2141
View attachment 2142
View attachment 2143
Click to expand...

Quarter Poll Update because it's late and I'm drinking Redbreast 12:

mmga45i27gn7.png
lu95c6koji1o.png
pk6bv8gcv0uh.png

 
I don't get the metrics obsession. I get the projection and historical comparisons part. But outside of serious gamblers, I don't understand why people get so passionate about that. Some out here seems to value metrics wins more than scoreboard, baby.
Click to expand...

Poont of clarification on my own personal stance since I don’t know if I’ve ever made it known:

I’m not a huge metrics guy. I’m with you on scoreboard. I find my main role and ultimately my purpose at HH is just Dooging over anything that looks good for my Dwags or makes my Dwags shine, or, poasting anything that I find interesting.

And all these metrics like Connelly’s S&P+, the Pick Six Previews, and now this Beta_Rank.... I find them I interesting. I enjoy seeing how they rank UW and generally it’s in a good light (#shocker; a well run program with elite coaching and development and increasing recruiting comes out shining in computer models).

I like to compare them and see what different ones come up with, and I like to investigate them to get a general sense of how teams are projected to be before the season starts (specifically the Pac-12). Then you see how those preseason projections crumble once the season is underway and the actual players on the field matter.

I don’t put a ton of stock in them, but I enjoy finding out how they perceive my favorite team as well as my hated teams. Then I like to poast them here for my brethren and fake internet friends to debate and fight over and call each other names or jerk each other off.

TL:DR

Grundle, all I want is to....

View attachment 21332
Click to expand...

Wasn't talking about you. I don't think, I dunno, do you fag out about these too?

If metrics are entertaining, enjoy. There is so much twatters metric smack though, it's cringey.

I do appreciate how Connelly goes about it. PAPNv1 (RIP) used it as a tool but not an end in itself.
Click to expand...

Most of it seems to be transitive property. The ones about development are mostly dumb too. The more 4 and 5 stars you have, the worse your development rates are going to be.
 
Rob Bowron is an asshat who likes to pretend he's smarter than everyone else.

FTG
https://twitter.com/PDawg206/status/1179429396295249920?s=20
https://twitter.com/beta_rank_fb/status/1179430521170006016?s=20
https://twitter.com/dawg206/status/1179430840306163713?s=20
https://twitter.com/beta_rank_fb/status/1179431254896365569?s=20
https://twitter.com/dawg206/status/1179431826789675008?s=20
https://twitter.com/beta_rank_fb/status/1179433959400394753?s=20
https://twitter.com/dawg206/status/1179441236912066560?s=20
https://twitter.com/beta_rank_fb/status/1179443178035929088?s=20
https://twitter.com/dawg206/status/1179446244931964930?s=20
https://twitter.com/beta_rank_fb/status/1179447665601515520?s=20
https://twitter.com/ExtraChrisB_/status/1179448768988508160?s=20
https://twitter.com/beta_rank_fb/status/1179449553021542400?s=20
https://twitter.com/dawg206/status/1179450080413327361?s=20
https://twitter.com/beta_rank_fb/status/1179450541862207488?s=20
 
Mr Saneky I saw your story on television it was very inspiring. I hope that all is well with you too.
Click to expand...

Classy posts like this just don't happen anymore in today's climate of rude college football fans

@RuffaloSoldier
@PurpleBaze
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top