An Analytical Approach to the Best and Worst Poasters

[UW_Doog_Bot]

What with the lack of football and teen boi action happening I decided to mess around with pulling data and taking an analytical approach to ranking poasters here at HH while bored at work. Without further delay here are the results according to the numbers.

Best Poasters[/b] (Combined Chin/WTF Ratio)

1. @Doog_de_Jour
2. @WhiskeyDawg
3. @minion_doog
4. @GaryFromTeenMom
5. @Swaye

Worst Poasters[/b]

1. @2001400ex
2. @ApostleofGrief
3. @oregonblitzkrieg
4. @MikeSeaver
5. @Mosster47

Most Rec'd [/b](Per Poast)

1. @BlastDoor
2. @Saracen
3. @Doog_de_Jour
4. @HuskyClaws
5. @minion_doog
6. @CokeGreaterThanPepsi
7. @SpoonieLuv
8. @NEsnake12
9. @NorwegianHusky
10. @Swaye

Most Anti-Rec'd [/b](Per Poast)

1. @oregonblitzkrieg
2. @puppylove_sugarsteel
3. @2001400ex
4. @BallzDeep
5. @ApostleofGrief
6. @MikeSeaver
7. @Mosster47
8. @Ice_Holmvik
9. @HoustonHusky
10. @Tequilla

Most Controversial[/b](Most Rec's & Anti-Rec's)

1. @puppylove_sugarsteel
2. @BallzDeep
3. @oregonblitzkrieg
4. @BaldwinIV
5. @Ice_Holmvik

I excluded poasters with < 50 poasts and obvious alt's like @Babushka. If you are curious to look at the data and see how I calculated the results you can find them here Data.

 

[Pitchfork51]

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

TL;DR

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

You were surprisingly in the lower half of negative recs. Step up your game?

 

[Pitchfork51]

You were surprisingly in the lower half of negative recs. Step up your game?

I dont know what it means. are you telling me to be a better poster or a worse one?

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

You're operating under the false premise that wtf's are actually a bad thing.

 

[RaceBannon]

If you post on the Tug or are a duck you don't do well in these metrics

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

You were surprisingly in the lower half of negative recs. Step up your game?

I dont know what it means. are you telling me to be a better poster or a worse one?

You're operating under the false premise that wtf's are actually a bad thing.

It's up to you to interpret the results.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

 

[HuskyJW]

Those are all the same person.

HTH

 

[PurpleBaze]

Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

That is some prime psycho stalker shit.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

If you post on the Tug or are a duck you don't do well in these metrics

If yewer goal is to troll a husky site then being ranked as one of the worst poasters isn't really a bad thing then is it?

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

That is some prime psycho stalker shit.

Not exactly hard data to pull. I'm sure @DerekJohnson has some type of analytic portal as a mod that is similar. If he doesn't then he needs better developers.

 

[Doogles]

The splooge WTF tour of 2016 has forever ruined my Chin/wtf ratio.

He got me over 1k WTFs in a couple of hours. A few others fell victim to it too.

 

[PurpleBaze]

The splooge WTF tour of 2016 has forever ruined my Chin/wtf ratio.

He got me over 1k WTFs in a couple of hours. A few others fell victim to it too.

1K is impressive. I think I got only 200-300 WTFs.

 

[PurpleBaze]

Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

That is some prime psycho stalker shit.

Not exactly hard data to pull. I'm sure @DerekJohnson has some type of analytic portal as a mod that is similar. If he doesn't then he needs better developers[/b].

Goes without saying. Although, he will use that as an excuse for his next money grab.

 

[YellowSnow]

So I'm like 21st out of 103 poasters here in popularity and that includes some of you guy's having multiple handles....

80TH PERCENTILE BITCHES!!

 

[Pitchfork51]

nm

 

[Pitchfork51]

it hurts to get crushed by Fear_Boner

 

[CuntWaffle]

Hondo is the worst by a landslide