TSIO
https://twitter.com/coachpeteuw/status/684769919569797120
academis smack
https://twitter.com/coachpeteuw/status/684769919569797120
academis smack
If you have 80 guys 3.0 or higher the cumulative should be greater than 3.13.
#AcademisFail
https://twitter.com/coachpeteuw/status/684769919569797120
academis smack
If you have 80 guys 3.0 or higher the cumulative should be greater than 3.13.
#AcademisFail
https://twitter.com/coachpeteuw/status/684769919569797120
academis smack
If you have 80 guys 3.0 or higher the cumulative should be greater than 3.13.
#AcademisFail
Can you show your work on that?
https://twitter.com/coachpeteuw/status/684769919569797120
academis smack
If you have 80 guys 3.0 or higher the cumulative should be greater than 3.13.
#AcademisFail
Can you show your work on that?
https://twitter.com/coachpeteuw/status/684769919569797120
academis smack
If you have 80 guys 3.0 or higher the cumulative should be greater than 3.13.
#AcademisFail
Can you show your work on that?
Assuming a normal distribution of 96 players and with 80 at 3.0 or above and with a mean of 3.13, the distribution would be:
![]()
Also, pinging @TheChart
Swahili was exposed by the media a couple years ago, what is the new free A class for football players at the U I wonder
https://twitter.com/coachpeteuw/status/684769919569797120
academis smack
If you have 80 guys 3.0 or higher the cumulative should be greater than 3.13.
#AcademisFail
Can you show your work on that?
https://twitter.com/coachpeteuw/status/684769919569797120
academis smack
If you have 80 guys 3.0 or higher the cumulative should be greater than 3.13.
#AcademisFail
Can you show your work on that?
Assuming a normal distribution of 96 players and with 80 at 3.0 or above and with a mean of 3.13, the distribution would be:
![]()
The only problem with using math as an absolute is that you are ASSUMING 96 players.