Absolute immunity

FWIW,
"I believe, " Absolute immunity doesn't provide protection when fraud was perpetrated.
Meaning if a person became President fraudulently they are not protected from prosecution
Fraud vitiates everything.

We better check with @HHusky to be sure though.
When you find a president like that, let us know.
What would you like us to do when you repeatedly ignore the (copious and growing amount of) evidence? Please advise.

.
 
Last edited:
The ruling today gives absolute immunity for actions taken in an official capacity. But it's impossible to make a list of official duties since the president could argue virtually any action is official. So in the hypothetical case of assassination of a rival, the president could argue it was his official duty, provide evidence, try to persuade the jury. That example was provided in the dissenting opinion. The jury would probably not buy it, but like any trial it depends on the evidence, jury, etc. The point is that a president can seriously present such an argument now.
Looking into election fraud is certainly a duty. There is mountains of evidence but the courts refuse to hear it. Everyone lacks standing. Sems to me every voter should have standing.
 
Where is it in the official duties of a President to order and execute the President-elect who just defeated you?
This is nonsensical and shows how desperate Democrats are to hold onto power.
Says the voter of the guy who actually, factually, desperately tried to hold on to power.
I believe there were glaring problems with the 2020 election. Read the “Proof” thread here for examples.. Did Trump linger in the White House after 12pm on 01/20/2021? I recall he left prior to it.
You’re not going to get away with just making things up here.
 
Where is it in the official duties of a President to order and execute the President-elect who just defeated you?
This is nonsensical and shows how desperate Democrats are to hold onto power.
Says the voter of the guy who actually, factually, desperately tried to hold on to power.
No, he rightfully tried to fight a stolestolen election because mentally ill people like you can't compete.
 
The meltdown of the left online is delicious! Watching these commie cocksuckers cry brings me joy! When Trump wins they will loose the illegals along with ANTIFA etc. But it will mean there won't be very many of them in the future!
 
The ruling today gives absolute immunity for actions taken in an official capacity. But it's impossible to make a list of official duties since the president could argue virtually any action is official. So in the hypothetical case of assassination of a rival, the president could argue it was his official duty, provide evidence, try to persuade the jury. That example was provided in the dissenting opinion. The jury would probably not buy it, but like any trial it depends on the evidence, jury, etc. The point is that a president can seriously present such an argument now.
Good
 
screenshot-20240701-141002.jpg
 
So hypothetically if Biden loses he could hypothetically order the hypothetical elimination of Mr Trump given that he actually is a threat to democracy.
Assassinating an elected President-elect because he is a “threat to Democracy” would make Biden a clear “threat to Democracy” and he’d be prosecuted and court-martialed.
That’s not at all what the SCOTUS decision allows but you Retards get fed talking points and spout them as factual.
You Leftists are completely unhinged and it’s rapidly reaching mass psychosis.
Rapidly Reaching? That was 4 to 8 years ago.
 
The meltdown of the left online is delicious! Watching these commie cocksuckers cry brings me joy! When Trump wins they will loose the illegals along with ANTIFA etc. But it will mean there won't be very many of them in the future!
It's spelled "lose." L O S E.
 
So hypothetically if Biden loses he could hypothetically order the hypothetical elimination of Mr Trump given that he actually is a threat to democracy.
How is Trump a threat to democracy when you know that biden and BO cheated during an election? They bugged a presidential campaign office and lied about Russian collusion so rats could over turn an election based upon lies?
Seriously, who is the real threat? There is clear evidence yet no one goes to prison.
 
Last edited:
So hypothetically if Biden loses he could hypothetically order the hypothetical elimination of Mr Trump given that he actually is a threat to democracy.
How is Trump a threat to democracy when you know that biden and BO cheated during an election? They bugged a presidential campaign office and lied about Russian collusion so rats could over turn an election based upon lies?
Seriously, who is the real threat?
I don't know. I'm not here making rational arguments (no point with you). I just pointed out hypotheticals.
 
So hypothetically if Biden loses he could hypothetically order the hypothetical elimination of Mr Trump given that he actually is a threat to democracy.
How is Trump a threat to democracy when you know that biden and BO cheated during an election? They bugged a presidential campaign office and lied about Russian collusion so rats could over turn an election based upon lies?
Seriously, who is the real threat?
The lockdowns and mask and vaxx mandates certainly weren't authoritarian at all. Especially blaming Trump for the blue state and city lockdowns and mask and vaxx mandates. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist and leftards lie and love to be lied to. Or alternately they are dumber than a bag of hammers or both.
 
So hypothetically if Biden loses he could hypothetically order the hypothetical elimination of Mr Trump given that he actually is a threat to democracy.
How is Trump a threat to democracy when you know that biden and BO cheated during an election? They bugged a presidential campaign office and lied about Russian collusion so rats could over turn an election based upon lies?
Seriously, who is the real threat?
I don't know. I'm not here making rational arguments (no point with you). I just pointed out hypotheticals.
You aren't capable of rational thought. Let alone rational discourse. Central education. Hth.
 
The meltdown of the left online is delicious! Watching these commie cocksuckers cry brings me joy! When Trump wins they will loose the illegals along with ANTIFA etc. But it will mean there won't be very many of them in the future!
It's spelled "lose." L O S E.
I don't know.... "loose" works in the context that the left will turn "loose" the illegals and Antifa to wreak havock on the streets but Trump will enforce law and order and jail or deport the lot of them. Unlike the lawless admin and DOJ now. Just using one word to say all that is fun!
Not exactly sure what context he intended but getting snippy about spelling is a sign you couldn't grasp the larger context that ultimately brings you back your understanding that the left will "Lose" their standing army of criminals.
 
Last edited:
The meltdown of the left online is delicious! Watching these commie cocksuckers cry brings me joy! When Trump wins they will loose the illegals along with ANTIFA etc. But it will mean there won't be very many of them in the future!
It's spelled "lose." L O S E.
Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn moreloose/lo͞os/adjective
verb
  1. set free; release."the hounds have been loosed"Similar:freeset freeunlooseturn looseset looselet looselet goreleaseliberateuntieunchainunfetteruntetherunfastenunpenunleashunclickOpposite:confine

TIP Similar-sounding words loose is sometimes confused with lose
 
The meltdown of the left online is delicious! Watching these commie cocksuckers cry brings me joy! When Trump wins they will loose the illegals along with ANTIFA etc. But it will mean there won't be very many of them in the future!
It's spelled "lose." L O S E.
Dictionary Definitions from https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en · https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/10106608?hl=enloose/lo͞os/adjective
verb

TIP Similar-sounding words loose is sometimes confused with https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=9cd90a64e37ec4fc&sca_upv=1&rlz=1C1VDKB_enUS990US990&sxsrf=ADLYWIIMXXrnqo3CjB2IMyY4r1cfuyodLg:1719878245774&q=lose&si=ACC90nw73JIKQ-K-utfaOJumrrjuiBB2oYaszOZwqy6Nls1U1x8gZhMa2MlbNAU0mZGrc-YohIsgkL72VS-gi57w5N3Y-x-PQw%3D%3D&expnd=1
I knew that was what you were going for 😉
 
Last edited:
The meltdown of the left online is delicious! Watching these commie cocksuckers cry brings me joy! When Trump wins they will loose the illegals along with ANTIFA etc. But it will mean there won't be very many of them in the future!
It's spelled "lose." L O S E.
Dictionary Definitions from https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en · https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/10106608?hl=enloose/lo͞os/adjective
verb

TIP Similar-sounding words loose is sometimes confused with https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=9cd90a64e37ec4fc&sca_upv=1&rlz=1C1VDKB_enUS990US990&sxsrf=ADLYWIIMXXrnqo3CjB2IMyY4r1cfuyodLg:1719878245774&q=lose&si=ACC90nw73JIKQ-K-utfaOJumrrjuiBB2oYaszOZwqy6Nls1U1x8gZhMa2MlbNAU0mZGrc-YohIsgkL72VS-gi57w5N3Y-x-PQw%3D%3D&expnd=1
I knew that was what you were going for 😉
lame, nice try
 
Ugh! Vanilla quote box strikes again
@AOG
Your reading comprehension is lacking.
"Loose the dogs"= "loose illegals and antifa"
 
Back
Top