A fair assessment of the state of Husky Football

N

NorthLakeDub

New Fish
What's up you fat cunted wife loving, pussy ass, sad sacks of your own circle jerk seamen loads ?!?!?!

Since I don't have the time, energy, ambition, intelligence, or writing prowess to give you the "evidence" of why I believe Husky Football is on the rise, I thought I would post the link to this article that basically sums up how I feel about our program. I'm sure many of you have already seen it. I think it is a fair assessment of the Husky Football program from an outsiders perspective. It clearly explains both the strengths and the weaknesses of our team. Here it is.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...huskies-2013-football-schedule-roster-preview
 
Your intro is boring. I think I will repost the article so people don't have to endure that piece of shit attempt at something.
 
Last edited:
I stopped reading when the author tried to give Sark a mythical 9-4 record for the 2012 season.
Click to expand...

You are a cynical bastard
Click to expand...

Yes. I believe in REAL football game results, not mythical ones.

If anything, that article just goes to show that Sark's teams are underperforming relative to the talent level the teams have. CFBMatrix has already been telling me that for years though.

 
I didn't read the article, don't have to. Outsider perspectives just go by media hype bullshit. Kirk Herbstriet said sark is the best play caller in the country a few years back, and everyone and their mother starting saying that BS. Anyone who has watched his play calling know it's average at best and ask U$C fans what they thought of his play calling.

Any average coach could win 6 or 7 games at UW EVEN after the 0-12 season. Let's not get too carried away over sarky.
 
I stopped reading when the author tried to give Sark a mythical 9-4 record for the 2012 season.
Click to expand...

He's using some kind of statistic to get that record. I'm not sure how its applicable because it counts Oregon as a win, USC as a win, OSU as a loss.

I don't know how beating Boise means its a 9-10 win season. Still have UO, and Stan, ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road. If you blow one game (say Cal or Arizona), you have to win 2 of the other 5 just to get to 8.

Nevertheless, I agree with the OP, its a quite reasonable article from an outsider.
 
Last edited:
Jesus. They're heading over here in droves. Who's the pied piper of doogism? 55? Damone?
Click to expand...

Are you paying attention?

Dawgman has become a fucking disgrace thanks to Kim. He's been completely wrong about everything since 2004. He's become a complete fucking embarrassment. He's ostracized so many posters that the place has become a carbon copy of what cougfan used to be. People over there are bitching and moaning more about this Oregon thing than Sark's pathetic blowouts and snatching 7-6 from the jaws of 9-4.

The only reason a few people are left is because there are still a few poasters around who want to talk about husky football. But they are leaving one by one and heading over here. Its evidence that Kim's fuckbaggery and douchetardedness have now vastly exceeded that of Race and his minions.

Wise up.
 
Last edited:
Jesus. They're heading over here in droves. Who's the pied piper of doogism? 55? Damone?
Click to expand...

Are you paying attention?

Dawgman has become a fucking disgrace thanks to Kim. He's been completely wrong about everything since 2004. He's become a complete fucking embarrassment. He's ostracized so many posters that the place has become a carbon copy of what cougfan used to be. People over there are bitching and moaning more about this Oregon thing than Sark's pathetic blowouts and snatching 7-6 from the jaws of 9-4.

The only reason a few people are left is because there are still a few poasters around who want to talk about husky football. But they are leaving one by one and heading over here. Its evidence that Kim's fuckbaggery and douchetardedness have now vastly exceeded that of Race and his minions.

Wise up.
Click to expand...

For the record, I was never on Dawgman. I don't know much about Kim and Fetters, other than they cover recruiting. The first time I saw Fetters I was like "who the hell is that fat ass dude standing in the background and what does he have to do with Husky Football?"
 
Jesus. They're heading over here in droves. Who's the pied piper of doogism? 55? Damone?
Click to expand...

Are you paying attention?

Dawgman has become a fucking disgrace thanks to Kim. He's been completely wrong about everything since 2004. He's become a complete fucking embarrassment. He's ostracized so many posters that the place has become a carbon copy of what cougfan used to be. People over there are bitching and moaning more about this Oregon thing than Sark's pathetic blowouts and snatching 7-6 from the jaws of 9-4.

The only reason a few people are left is because there are still a few poasters around who want to talk about husky football. But they are leaving one by one and heading over here. Its evidence that Kim's fuckbaggery and douchetardedness have now vastly exceeded that of Race and his minions.

Wise up.
Click to expand...

And you're not seeing the parallels? You're here.

HTH
 
Having only read the preamble I see the author claims we will still be young while Phil Steele said we will be one of the most experienced teams. Sounds like somebody has an agenda.
 
What's this bullshit about Race and his minions anyway? If you're just here to beat your chest you won't last long. I know Harvey Road. I pick up the phone and you're gone
 
I stopped reading when the author tried to give Sark a mythical 9-4 record for the 2012 season.
Click to expand...

I don't get why people insist this team was almost 9-4 without mentioning if OSU and Stanford started the right QB this team goes fucking 5-7. Sark is more than ahead on the close calls. UW had a run of like 11 games in a row they won by where the outcome was decided by 8 points or less. I refuse to read any piece that tries to give Sark credit for a mythical 9-4 season.
 
The piece isnt giving him credit for that. It has some statistical model that says 9-4 and doesn't mention it beyond that.

Here is an instructive statistical analysis:

In terms of F/+ rankings, the Huskies ranked 78th in 2005, 60th in 2006, 50th in 2007, 63rd in 2009, 70th in 2010, 67th in 2011, and 56th in 2012. Average ranking in those seven seasons: 63.4. Granted, this ignores a year in which they were, in Matt Hinton's words, "really awful" (that would be the 2008 season that saw them go 0-12, rank 117th, and get Ty Willingham fired), but that one outlier aside, there has been almost no trend, just slightly different grades of average football.
 
I didn't pay any attention to that adjusted score bs. I don't know what that was all about. But I understand if you are so sick of average Husky Football that you can no longer even bring yourself to read articles about the team. Personally, I enjoy reading anything about Husky FB. If you do happen to find the time to read it, the rest of the article seems pretty straight forward and honest to me.

I don't think the author was being overly biased in favor of Sark. His shortcomings as a coach are clearly laid out, along with his accomplishments. And when the author says we are young, he is talking about the 19 returning starters who the majority of were freshmen or sophomores last season.

So the question is whether or not you think these young guys can build upon their experience after being battle tested early in their college careers, and step up and play at a championship level, with consistency, in order to finish the close games and dominate the ones that we should be dominating. Can Sark grow with this team into a smarter, battle tested coach that can finally lift our program to the level that we all expect?
 
I didn't pay any attention to that adjusted score bs. I don't know what that was all about. But I understand if you are so sick of average Husky Football that you can no longer even bring yourself to read articles about the team. Personally, I enjoy reading anything about Husky FB. If you do happen to find the time to read it, the rest of the article seems pretty straight forward and honest to me.

I don't think the author was being overly biased in favor of Sark. His shortcomings as a coach are clearly laid out, along with his accomplishments. And when the author says we are young, he is talking about the 19 returning starters who the majority of were freshmen or sophomores last season.

So the question is whether or not you think these young guys can build upon their experience after being battle tested early in their college careers, and step up and play at a championship level, with consistency, in order to finish the close games and dominate the ones that we should be dominating. Can Sark grow with this team into a smarter, battle tested coach that can finally lift our program to the level that we all expect?
Click to expand...

The answer to your question is no.
 
I didn't pay any attention to that adjusted score bs. I don't know what that was all about. But I understand if you are so sick of average Husky Football that you can no longer even bring yourself to read articles about the team. Personally, I enjoy reading anything about Husky FB. If you do happen to find the time to read it, the rest of the article seems pretty straight forward and honest to me.

I don't think the author was being overly biased in favor of Sark. His shortcomings as a coach are clearly laid out, along with his accomplishments. And when the author says we are young, he is talking about the 19 returning starters who the majority of were freshmen or sophomores last season.

So the question is whether or not you think these young guys can build upon their experience after being battle tested early in their college careers, and step up and play at a championship level, with consistency, in order to finish the close games and dominate the ones that we should be dominating. Can Sark grow with this team into a smarter, battle tested coach that can finally lift our program to the level that we all expect?
Click to expand...

The answer to your question is no.
Click to expand...

In your opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top