5th Airplane on 9/11 - FBI Coverup?
- Thread starter pawz
- Start date
Content providers need to be better. This was on X as BREAKING. I thought to myself - I've seen this before. Turns out it is 2 years old and was on Youtube and the A&E Network where I saw it
It's interesting and convincing. Probably true. It also shows how retarded the FBI is. No reason to deny it happened
The government was not directly involved in 9-11. Osama was an asset that got out of control. You had the same dumbfucks in government that didn't want to look at the hijackers because of profiling and they knew they fucked to dog bigly
Hey we don't need to learn how to land brother
It's interesting and convincing. Probably true. It also shows how retarded the FBI is. No reason to deny it happened
The government was not directly involved in 9-11. Osama was an asset that got out of control. You had the same dumbfucks in government that didn't want to look at the hijackers because of profiling and they knew they fucked to dog bigly
Hey we don't need to learn how to land brother
The reason I will never believe out government was not involved, is because Building 7 was so clearly a controlled demolition. A controlled demolition takes WEEKS to set up.
I’m happy to leave the rest of the day up for debate.
I agree this story is kind of a nothing burger other than additional background information.
.
I’m happy to leave the rest of the day up for debate.
I agree this story is kind of a nothing burger other than additional background information.
.
That's pretty much where I'm at too
Independent thinking is dangerous. Here take this pill
DucksFC
Active poster
”I do my own research” is still stupid when a stupid person does it.
As you prove so adroitly
Take your pill and believe what your told to believe
Again popular mechanics debunks that
DucksFC
Active poster
stupid people reading stupid things doesn’t make them any less stupid. In fact quite the opposite.
Little harsh on H there
No it didn’t.
There is only ever one explanation for a building falling in free-fall speed into its own footprint.
If you want to ignore the obvious, it’s on you.
.
I've already debunked you claim popular mechanic debunked it because the "documentaries" that I provided you links to and you still refuse to watch, were made 2-3 years AFTER your popular mechanics debunking article.
Last edited:
Nope. Gravity. You ever watch videos of someone being shot and instantly dying? Its not like the movies where they fly 5 feet before landing. They literally just drop where they were standing. No tipping over, just dropping. Imagine thinking the steel at the bottom of a building, with raging fires, greatly weakening the steel, would be able to hold the immense weight above it. And then, imagine that instead of the just dropping it straight down the steel would somehow pitch remnants above it, some of which was also substantially weakened, into neighboring areas. The amount of force required to tip a building over would need to be greater than force of gravity. Pretty hard to do. Then on top of that, you'd have to believe that the structure, now tipping over, would retain its form, then not also resisting the forces of gravity.
Fire:
Oh shit, water doing the same thing:
Watch as the remnant starts to tip, then wildly collapses on itself. Wild!
I watched it, didn't debunked shit