4th Annual Jesse Callier Post-Collegiate Impact Ranking Survey RESULTS (2018)

[UW_Doog_Bot]

I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

1 - Did nothing, washed out.
2 - Contributed, but never started consistently; or starter on a bad team.
3 - Started consistently, never hit All Conference in any real way.
4 - All Conference of some sort, multi-year starter.
5 - All American.

Fully admit to being retarded and doing this wrong.

Should have dug into my position and tried to justify it with a TLDR poast instead of just admitting to saying/doing something stupid. Wood have been better for the bored IMO.

#FireJimmyLake

 

[Dennis_DeYoung]

I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

1 - Did nothing, washed out.
2 - Contributed, but never started consistently; or starter on a bad team.
3 - Started consistently, never hit All Conference in any real way.
4 - All Conference of some sort, multi-year starter.
5 - All American.

Fully admit to being retarded and doing this wrong.

Should have dug into my position and tried to justify it with a TLDR poast instead of just admitting to saying/doing something stupid. Wood have been better for the bored IMO.

#FireJimmyLake

You’re learning.

 

[Swaye]

I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

1 - Did nothing, washed out.
2 - Contributed, but never started consistently; or starter on a bad team.
3 - Started consistently, never hit All Conference in any real way.
4 - All Conference of some sort, multi-year starter.
5 - All American.

Fully admit to being retarded and doing this wrong.

Should have dug into my position and tried to justify it with a TLDR poast instead of just admitting to saying/doing something stupid. Wood have been better for the bored IMO.

#FireJimmyLake

I always just take the L when I say stupid shit, which is often. But you are correct, the bored prefers verbal fisticuffs.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

1 - Did nothing, washed out.
2 - Contributed, but never started consistently; or starter on a bad team.
3 - Started consistently, never hit All Conference in any real way.
4 - All Conference of some sort, multi-year starter.
5 - All American.

Fully admit to being retarded and doing this wrong.

Should have dug into my position and tried to justify it with a TLDR poast instead of just admitting to saying/doing something stupid. Wood have been better for the bored IMO.

#FireJimmyLake

You’re learning.

 

[FremontTroll]

I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

Wait, if you were scoring too low then how do you explain the 2s for Sterk and Lewis?

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

Wait, if you were scoring too low then how do you explain the 2s for Sterk and Lewis?

If I went back and redid my scores now I would bump a lot of people up but not them. You can very easily convince me to bump them down to 1's. If everyone else's scores were distributed more or less normally around 3 my scores would have been centered farther left with an average of 2 or less. I gave out scores which "clustered" a lot of people into a 2 who shouldn't have been there. I also didn't think about it too much and admitted to being retarded. *shrug