a Q?
a Q?
CF, SE, DM, a Q?
The pom pom crowd at doogman was none too pleased with me for this. After years of being mildly bothered by that guy (jsmdawg or something like that) posting the same thread title with the same inane questions, I pointed out a few things he could stand to change about his approach. Other people would answer his questions but he'd ignore that and post it again trying to get the mods to engage. I'm not saying it should have, but it started to really bug me.
Johnb and a couple of other fags came running to his defense. I thought I was pretty nice about it.
a Q?
CF, SE, DM, a Q?
The pom pom crowd at doogman was none too pleased with me for this. After years of being mildly bothered by that guy (jsmdawg or something like that) posting the same thread title with the same inane questions, I pointed out a few things he could stand to change about his approach. Other people would answer his questions but he'd ignore that and post it again trying to get the mods to engage. I'm not saying it should have, but it started to really bug me.
Johnb and a couple of other fags came running to his defense. I thought I was pretty nice about it.
Huh?
a Q?
CF, SE, DM, a Q?
The pom pom crowd at doogman was none too pleased with me for this. After years of being mildly bothered by that guy (jsmdawg or something like that) posting the same thread title with the same inane questions, I pointed out a few things he could stand to change about his approach. Other people would answer his questions but he'd ignore that and post it again trying to get the mods to engage. I'm not saying it should have, but it started to really bug me.
Johnb and a couple of other fags came running to his defense. I thought I was pretty nice about it.
Huh?
You serious?
If so, I think the poster above made reference to jsmdawgs Q? posting habits from the old days. Maybe not.
a Q?
CF, SE, DM, a Q?
The pom pom crowd at doogman was none too pleased with me for this. After years of being mildly bothered by that guy (jsmdawg or something like that) posting the same thread title with the same inane questions, I pointed out a few things he could stand to change about his approach. Other people would answer his questions but he'd ignore that and post it again trying to get the mods to engage. I'm not saying it should have, but it started to really bug me.
Johnb and a couple of other fags came running to his defense. I thought I was pretty nice about it.
Huh?
You serious?
If so, I think the poster above made reference to jsmdawgs Q? posting habits from the old days. Maybe not.
He's responding to the "CF" part of the "Q?"
a Q?
CF, SE, DM, a Q?
The pom pom crowd at doogman was none too pleased with me for this. After years of being mildly bothered by that guy (jsmdawg or something like that) posting the same thread title with the same inane questions, I pointed out a few things he could stand to change about his approach. Other people would answer his questions but he'd ignore that and post it again trying to get the mods to engage. I'm not saying it should have, but it started to really bug me.
Johnb and a couple of other fags came running to his defense. I thought I was pretty nice about it.
Huh?
You serious?
If so, I think the poster above made reference to jsmdawgs Q? posting habits from the old days. Maybe not.
He's responding to the "CF" part of the "Q?"
Was just watching the Beta Rank episode for Washington and it was mentioned how FS it is to jerk off over anything recruiting related in July.
That being said, 35 national average over two years, it's obvious that the staff needs to, and should, improve in that department.
Was just watching the Beta Rank episode for Washington and it was mentioned how FS it is to jerk off over anything recruiting related in July.
That being said, 35 national average over two years, it's obvious that the staff needs to, and should, improve in that department.
What's Chinteresting is that no particular coach has struggled recruiting wise under DeBoer. With Peterman, the WR coach (Brett something) and OL (Strausser) struggled some so Peterman upgraded to Junior Adams and Scott Huff.
There are a couple of position coaches who would benefit from having a good 2025 class but with NIL, it's very difficult to know who is simply getting out-bid.
Was just watching the Beta Rank episode for Washington and it was mentioned how FS it is to jerk off over anything recruiting related in July.
That being said, 35 national average over two years, it's obvious that the staff needs to, and should, improve in that department.
What's Chinteresting is that no particular coach has struggled recruiting wise under DeBoer. With Peterman, the WR coach (Brett something) and OL (Strausser) struggled some so Peterman upgraded to Junior Adams and Scott Huff.
There are a couple of position coaches who would benefit from having a good 2025 class but with NIL, it's very difficult to know who is simply getting out-bid.
I think I read in a Twitter feed after media day that DeBoer says they are only looking to add 4-5 more HS players. That would put the class at 16-17. Seems light. Maybe they have a plan to fund some serious portal players after this years paid players graduate or leave early.
I think I read in a Twitter feed after media day that DeBoer says they are only looking to add 4-5 more HS players. That would put the class at 16-17. Seems light. Maybe they have a plan to fund some serious portal players after this years paid players graduate or leave early.
He made that statement on Friday and either Vorel or Caple reported on it.