1992 #20 USC @ #1 Washington No Huddle

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-10-04-sp-977-story.html

0fqzr5b7g87m.jpeg
 
I was there. The cracks were showing. SC was faster and more athletic. UW defense still lived in the backfield but struggled to bring guys down. The corners couldn't hang with SCs 5* receivers. UWs receivers couldn't separate and Beno/Kauffman couldn't run away from a stacked box full of great athletes.

So yeah, we walked out of there shaking our heads in doubt over the #1 ranking.
 
USC was always a tough out. It was 14-0 in 91 and USC won three games that year. Both those games hurt us but I was just glad to beat those fuckers by any score

Also in 1991 the big reason we "knew" UW could win it all was because UCLA wasn't on the schedule. They had won 3 games in 1990, one of them being one of the worst losses ever for our DAWGS

UW under James had 80% of the schedule on lockdown. They didn't lose to Cal, Stanford, or the NW Three. Those were W's going in

It was always between UW, UCLA, USC, and ASU for recruits and the league. It's why UW was first or second for years and years under James

Today we have no one on lockdown. Cal and Stanford are mysteries, Oregon always wins. We just have the Apple Cup
 
Last edited:
USC was always a tough out. It was 14-0 in 91 and USC won three games that year. Both those games hurt us but I was just glad to beat those fuckers by any score

Also in 1991 the big reason we "knew" UW could win it all was because UCLA wasn't on the schedule. They had won 3 games in 1990, one of them being one of the worst losses ever for our DAWGS

UW under James had 80% of the schedule on lockdown. They didn't lose to Cal, Stanford, or the NW Three. Those were W's going in

It was always between UW, UCLA, USC, and ASU for recruits and the league. It's why UW was first or second for years and years under James

Today we have no one on lockdown.[/b] Cal and Stanford are mysteries, Oregon always wins. We just have the Apple Cup
Click to expand...
Why do you hate Britain Covey?

q0FriQw.gif


 
USC was always a tough out. It was 14-0 in 91 and USC won three games that year. Both those games hurt us but I was just glad to beat those fuckers by any score

Also in 1991 the big reason we "knew" UW could win it all was because UCLA wasn't on the schedule. They had won 3 games in 1990, one of them being one of the worst losses ever for our DAWGS

UW under James had 80% of the schedule on lockdown. They didn't lose to Cal, Stanford, or the NW Three. Those were W's going in

It was always between UW, UCLA, USC, and ASU for recruits and the league. It's why UW was first or second for years and years under James

Today we have no one on lockdown. Cal and Stanford are mysteries, Oregon always wins. We just have the Apple Cup
Click to expand...

*14-3
 
USC was always a tough out. It was 14-0 in 91 and USC won three games that year. Both those games hurt us but I was just glad to beat those fuckers by any score

Also in 1991 the big reason we "knew" UW could win it all was because UCLA wasn't on the schedule. They had won 3 games in 1990, one of them being one of the worst losses ever for our DAWGS

UW under James had 80% of the schedule on lockdown. They didn't lose to Cal, Stanford, or the NW Three. Those were W's going in

It was always between UW, UCLA, USC, and ASU for recruits and the league. It's why UW was first or second for years and years under James

Today we have no one on lockdown. Cal and Stanford are mysteries, Oregon always wins. We just have the Apple Cup
Click to expand...

*14-3
Click to expand...

QLITP
 
USC was always a tough out. It was 14-0 in 91 and USC won three games that year. Both those games hurt us but I was just glad to beat those fuckers by any score

Also in 1991 the big reason we "knew" UW could win it all was because UCLA wasn't on the schedule. They had won 3 games in 1990, one of them being one of the worst losses ever for our DAWGS

UW under James had 80% of the schedule on lockdown. They didn't lose to Cal, Stanford, or the NW Three. Those were W's going in

It was always between UW, UCLA, USC, and ASU for recruits and the league. It's why UW was first or second for years and years under James

Today we have no one on lockdown. Cal and Stanford are mysteries, Oregon always wins. We just have the Apple Cup
Click to expand...

*14-3
Click to expand...

From memory or Google?
 
Did Walter Bailey fumble the ball after that INT at the end of the game? It looks like he just drops the ball in the end zone.
 
I was there. The cracks were showing. SC was faster and more athletic. UW defense still lived in the backfield but struggled to bring guys down. The corners couldn't hang with SCs 5* receivers. UWs receivers couldn't separate and Beno/Kauffman couldn't run away from a stacked box full of great athletes.

So yeah, we walked out of there shaking our heads in doubt over the #1 ranking.
Click to expand...

Losing Bailey and McKay hurt. Those guys were good
 
Last edited:
USC was always a tough out. It was 14-0 in 91 and USC won three games that year. Both those games hurt us but I was just glad to beat those fuckers by any score

Also in 1991 the big reason we "knew" UW could win it all was because UCLA wasn't on the schedule. They had won 3 games in 1990, one of them being one of the worst losses ever for our DAWGS

UW under James had 80% of the schedule on lockdown. They didn't lose to Cal, Stanford, or the NW Three. Those were W's going in

It was always between UW, UCLA, USC, and ASU for recruits and the league. It's why UW was first or second for years and years under James

Today we have no one on lockdown. Cal and Stanford are mysteries, Oregon always wins. We just have the Apple Cup
Click to expand...

*14-3
Click to expand...

From memory or Google?
Click to expand...

Memory of course
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top