6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Where my code breakers at?
- Thread starter YellowSnow
- Start date
Bread
New Fish
Trigger warning. Math ahead.
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a that ends in binary representation with floor(a/4); a(1)=1. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 29...
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98...
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...a(n+1) = smallest number greater a
that ends in binary representation with floor(a/4); a(1)=1. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 29...Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98...
GrundleStiltzkin
New Fish
^filth
EsophagealFeces
Well-known poster
Trigger warning. Math ahead.
View attachment 17889
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98...
Is it just me, or does that look like Nicholas Cage's face photoshopped onto David Schwimmer's body?
EsophagealFeces
Well-known poster
I totally read that as code talkers, so naturally I was going to tag @Swaye.
Correct on the bottom sequence. Number of 247 composite (fuck off) blue chips in each Pete’s first 6 classes at UW.
Those guys were Navajo nation. @Swaye ‘s
Cherokees actually created their own written language.
EsophagealFeces
Well-known poster
Don't be fucking up my joke with your historical facts and shit, bro.
GreenRiverGatorz
New Fish
Trigger warning. Math ahead.
View attachment 17889
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98...
Is it just me, or does that look like Nicholas Cage's face photoshopped onto David Schwimmer's body?
Well now you can't convince me that that's not Nic Cage's face.
Yes, he just might be the guy.
DawgFader
New Fish
Trigger warning. Math ahead.
View attachment 17889
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98...
Is it just me, or does that look like Nicholas Cage's face photoshopped onto David Schwimmer's body?
Interesting stuff
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.
Last edited:
HillsboroDuck
New Fish
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.
How many chances at signature wins were blown because of the talent definciency at QB?
GrundleStiltzkin
New Fish
Pete is a stubborn fuck but we need to move on from his getting it wrong on Jake as see if one of these other guys can play. I have faith.
Ngata lot we can do other than watch this class develop and hope they close on their top targets the next couple years. Pete is safe - they continue to win 10+ a year and he can go without ever getting a signature win and he's not going to be fired.