What I'm hearing...

FremontTroll

New Fish
It is really the quality of the recruits that matters not the quantity and UW was in the top 15 by average star quality.

Lets hear it for this new staff- outstanding job, in a pandemic nonetheless.

Just what I'm hearing out here, don't twist.
 
I've seen the average star quality argument used before. It didn't end well
 
I've seen the average star quality argument used before. It didn't end well

Only when UW signs a small class.

When UW signs 30 then their class is being underrated because the recruiting service only considers the top 25 signees.
 
People don't understand the damage CHAZ did to the program. Jimmy's had a lot to clean-up, and frankly he's done a FANTASTIC job given what he had to work with.
 
People don't understand the damage CHAZ did to the program. Jimmy's had a lot to clean-up, and frankly he's done a FANTASTIC job given what he had to work with.

Ya think CHAZ would help us!
 
I’m pro average star rankings in almost every case.

When you take a knee and opt out of a class, that would be the exception.

Truth is the star average is only decent because Sam is propping it up.
 
I’m pro average star rankings in almost every case.

When you take a knee and opt out of a class, that would be the exception.

Truth is the star average is only decent because Sam is propping it up.

The average star thing is a good gauge if you're comparing a team with 20 commits to a team with 27 commits. The average star ranking needs to be much higher than this if you're only taking 15 commits.
 
I’m pro average star rankings in almost every case.

When you take a knee and opt out of a class, that would be the exception.

Truth is the star average is only decent because Sam is propping it up.

The average star thing is a good gauge if you're comparing a team with 20 commits to a team with 27 commits. The average star ranking needs to be much higher than this if you're only taking 15 commits.

I honestly don’t disagree
 
Back
Top