"We" split the next two

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

and no blowout loss...

What do you say? Are you happy with that? okay with that? Is that enough progress? Do they need to win the next 2 and win the North to prove there's progress?

 

[RaceBannon]

Yes

 

[CuntWaffle]

Can't we just enjoy being 4-0?

 

[Mad_Son]

Assuming no blow out means that we played well, then that would be acceptable.

 

[fivehundredmileDAWG]

Split with no plunger rape... Meaning 9 point loss or less .. And not having to score two late cosmetic TD's to make it that close ... And I'll be happy :-bd

... But wait... Maybe ill just be confused and tortured... Because I can't be miserable then...

 

[jmc84]

Yeah, I can live with that.

 

[RaceBannon]

When we can honestly expect to win the next two in the 5th season of the next coach at Washington we'll be good

 

[[Deleted User]]

It doesn't matter. Get your plungers out!

This team getting plunger raped next two weeks.

 

[CuntWaffle]

if we split and no plungers we will go 11-1. Or at least should unless Sark fucks it up, which is most likely.

Ehh I don't know what I am talking about I guess, going to drink more.

 

[Swaye]

Lose by 14 or less in one, and win the other, and I will be happy. That would mean 5-1 and we beat one of the best teams in the country, and hung close to another one.

 

[PurpleJ]

I don't deal in hypotheticals.

 

[RaceBannon]

Thread over

 

[[Deleted User]]

I don't deal in hypotheticals.

Unless you are talking about hypothetical 9-4's.....

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Season over

 

[RoadDawg55]

It would depend on how the rest of the season played out, but splitting against two top 5 teams would be great, and anyone who says otherwise is just as bad as AuburnDawg.

 

[topdawgnc]

Tonight the Huskies have to prove themselves.

They are #15, gotten tons of free pub, and playing prime time (for those west of the Rockies) on ESPN.

Winning in year 5 would be expected, but beating the spread would be acceptable.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

It would depend on how the rest of the season played out, but splitting against two top 5 teams would be great, and anyone who says otherwise is just as bad as AuburnDawg.

I miss WASHINGTON (RIP) dammit.

 

[RoadDawg55]

It would depend on how the rest of the season played out, but splitting against two top 5 teams would be great, and anyone who says otherwise is just as bad as AuburnDawg.

I miss WASHINGTON (RIP) dammit.

I do too, but it is what it is. When you have gone 7-6 three straight years, 10-3 doesn't sound so bad.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

It would depend on how the rest of the season played out, but splitting against two top 5 teams would be great, and anyone who says otherwise is just as bad as AuburnDawg.

I miss WASHINGTON (RIP) dammit.

I do too, but it is what it is. When you have gone 7-6 three straight years, 10-3 doesn't sound so bad.

Thanks for visiting the bored, Mr. Woodward.

 

[topdawgnc]

It would depend on how the rest of the season played out, but splitting against two top 5 teams would be great, and anyone who says otherwise is just as bad as AuburnDawg.

I miss WASHINGTON (RIP) dammit.

I do too, but it is what it is. When you have gone 7-6 three straight years, 10-3 doesn't sound so bad.

It's year fucking 5 and Sark is the highest paid coach in the Pac12.

He won the fucking Holiday Bowl in year 2.

When can we expect a win on prime time against a heavy favorite not named USC who is running an offense Sark developed? Next year? It's always next year to doogs.