UW at Stan prediction

UW at Stan prediction

  • Total voters
    35
I am probably going to end up looking like the bruised girl in the pic, but I think we have a good chance if....

1. we load up the box and make Hogan beat us. Tonight was his 1st really big game for Stanford.

2. Bishop gets @ least 25 carries

3. KP has no TOs and is sacked less than 2 times or less

But we cannot leave points of the field in the 1st half.
 
I am probably going to end up looking like the bruised girl in the pic, but I think we have a good chance if....

1. we load up the box and make Hogan beat us. Tonight was his 1st really big game for Stanford.

2. Bishop gets @ least 25 carries

3. KP has no TOs and is sacked less than 2 times or less

But we cannot leave points of the field in the 1st half.
Click to expand...

We have four years of data to show that Sark isn't winning this game.
 
I think Stanford wins by more than a score, but less than a plunger. Then again, they may pound the shit out of us all game long until we give up in the 2nd half. Shit, I probably should have voted plunger.
 
I am probably going to end up looking like the bruised girl in the pic, but I think we have a good chance if....

1. we load up the box and make Hogan beat us. Tonight was his 1st really big game for Stanford.

2. Bishop gets @ least 25 carries

3. KP has no TOs and is sacked less than 2 times or less

But we cannot leave points of the field in the 1st half.
Click to expand...

We have about a 20% chance. If we commit more than one t.o., that goes down to one percent. We did beat them last year. And Hogan isn't an All-'Mericun.
 
I am probably going to end up looking like the bruised girl in the pic, but I think we have a good chance if....

1. we load up the box and make Hogan beat us. Tonight was his 1st really big game for Stanford. Partially Agree. Stanford's run game is physical, but they aren't incredibly explosive. It's tough to score a lot of points getting 4 or 5 yards a pop. We have to be stingy in the red zone, and we have to get off the field on third down.

2. Bishop gets @ least 25 carries- This will happen. Hopefully he will have some lanes. Stanford's D is very, very good.

3. KP has no TOs and is sacked less than 2 times or less- Don't see this happening.

But we cannot leave points of the field in the 1st half.
Click to expand...
Agree. We basically need to play near our max level for all 4 quarters. Penalties, bad play calling, unforced errors, and it's all over.

I think we will lose, but I also think we are finally good enough that we won't get plungered.

 
This game should be decent, but Sark's teams have shown no resiliency when falling behind big, and I'm afraid that's what happens in this one. Tree by 15+. May not be full blown plunger, but it will be close.
 
Fuck it. I have every reason to vote plunger but I voted win. I'll be there at the game and want to see a victory. Prove me wrong, Sark.
 
Washington's scoring efficiency sucks. Stanford is the league bully, easily the most physical team in the conference, and now they're featuring some speed. This is the first game of the season for the Huskies. Unlike their game against ASU, Sanford won't take their foot off the pedal too early. Expect to see a beat down regardless of the score.
 
WA is cream puff soft in the red zone and inefficient as noted above.

This is a very average team. The outcome depends on Stanford. How good are they? If they are as advertised, do they play to their potential? (Last year they did not.)

Last night the dawgs displayed yet again what they are. If AZ had an average QB I don't know if we win? If we win at Stanford, I'll start changing my tune. Dawgs lose this one 8 out 10 times.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top