UW #23 - USA Today season preview

IrishDawg22

IrishDawg22

New Fish
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...-depth-chart-schedule-football-four/13988369/

"2013 Low point: The three-week run of Stanford, Oregon and Arizona State. Strong indeed is the team that can survive such a stretch. The Huskies weren't quite there."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"In a nutshell: One of the great coaches in college football has walked into an optimal situation. This isn't just in the long run, though it's easy to get caught up dreaming about what Petersen can achieve during the course of a half-decade in Seattle"
 
Last edited:
...we're winning at least one of those...if not two.
 
Last edited:
If we don't go 2-1 at home vs Furd, Asu and ucla I will be disappointed. 11-2 or 10-3
 
He's obviously a good coach but he hasn't proved himself in the big leagues yet. You will likely beat ASU. UCLA, I wouldn't bet on it the way they owned you up and down the field last year. But Zumwalt is gone, so you might have a chance. And Stanford is a mountain you might not have the chops yet to climb.
 
Last edited:
UCLA owned us up and down the field? lol

also that is another preview that once again sugarcoats sark's tenure and record at washington. none mention his conference record. none mention his W-L when trailing at halftime. none talk about the 3 game losing streaks. the blowouts. the inconsistency. why does the media always blow this guy?
 
He's obviously a good coach but he hasn't proved himself in the big leagues yet. You will likely beat ASU. UCLA, I wouldn't bet on it the way they owned you up and down the field last year. But Zumwalt is gone, so you might have a chance. And Stanford is a mountain you might not have the chops yet to climb.
Click to expand...

You didnt watch the UCLA game if that's what you think happened
 
Minus Sark we went toe to toe with ucla while sark himself motivated Jack. Now we upgraded coach and play at home. We seem to play Stanford better than anyone and we upgraded coach and now have a ST coach that will be good for 8.1 points alone.

NYBE OBK
 
The o/u in wins for the regular season is 10.5 ...

OBKFS needs to remember that Seven Win Steve beat Stanford at home 2 years ago and should have beat them last year ... there's no reason to be afraid of them.

As for UCLA, better ball security in the first 5 minutes of the game combined with Price not getting hurt leads to a win on the road last year. November in Seattle doesn't historically treat teams from SoCal too well.
 
He's obviously a good coach but he hasn't proved himself in the big leagues yet. You will likely beat ASU. UCLA, I wouldn't bet on it the way they owned you up and down the field last year. But Zumwalt is gone, so you might have a chance. And Stanford is a mountain you might not have the chops yet to climb.
Click to expand...

You didnt watch the UCLA game if that's what you think happened
Click to expand...

It's been a while, but it looked like Myles Jack was ripping shit up while Zumwalt furnished the bookends on a convincing defeat.
 
The o/u in wins for the regular season is 10.5 ...

OBKFS needs to remember that Seven Win Steve beat Stanford at home 2 years ago and should have beat them last year ... there's no reason to be afraid of them.

As for UCLA, better ball security in the first 5 minutes of the game combined with Price not getting hurt leads to a win on the road last year. November in Seattle doesn't historically treat teams from SoCal too well.
Click to expand...

Almost beating Stanford 2 years ago and getting fucked over by our shitty kicker along with some bogus ref calls didn't get the ducks any love around these parts. If Stanford owned us in 2012 by winning by a field goal, they owned you in 2013, even though it was a close game decided by a few points. Keep the logic consistent.
 
Last edited:
Are you really asking/wondering why ducks get no love on a husky website really? Ok no more picking on you pal.

QPOTCentury
 
Last edited:
The o/u in wins for the regular season is 10.5 ...

OBKFS needs to remember that Seven Win Steve beat Stanford at home 2 years ago and should have beat them last year ... there's no reason to be afraid of them.

As for UCLA, better ball security in the first 5 minutes of the game combined with Price not getting hurt leads to a win on the road last year. November in Seattle doesn't historically treat teams from SoCal too well.
Click to expand...

Almost beating Stanford 2 years ago and getting fucked over by our shitty kicker along with some bogus ref calls didn't get the ducks any love around these parts. If Stanford owned us in 2012 by winning by a field goal, they owned you in 2013, even though it was a close game decided by a few points. Keep the logic consistent.
Click to expand...

Stanford vs. Oregon 2012-2013: 2-0
Stanford vs. Washington 2012-2013: 1-1

Learn the difference fucktard
 
OBK announced today that he is gay becoming the first internet poster to come out while still actively posting.

#Courage
 
Almost beating Stanford 2 years ago and getting fucked over by our shitty kicker along with some bogus ref calls didn't get the ducks any love around these parts. If Stanford owned us in 2012 by winning by a field goal, they owned you in 2013, even though it was a close game decided by a few points. Keep the logic consistent.
Click to expand...

They did own us in 2013.
http://espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=332780024

The stats don't show it well but special teams and penalties screwed us over against Stanford (two of Sark's hallmarks as a coach). Montgomery had 204 yards on KOR, including a 99-yard TD and a 68-yard KOR that set up a TD 2 plays later. Barry Sander's PR in the 1Q put them deep in UW territory (but fortunately, Hogan sucks). We had 89 penalty yards but 4 of those penalties either killed our drives or kept Stanford's alive (holding on 3rd and short, hands to the face on a 3rd down stop, etc.).

We may have outgained Stanford offensively 489-279, but they outgained us in special teams and penalty yards by a drastic 332-99. That's 233 of easy yards given up by shitty coaching. That's why they owned us.

They owned us in 2013 but we know with a real football coach, the game will be significantly different here in Seattle.
 
Almost beating Stanford 2 years ago and getting fucked over by our shitty kicker along with some bogus ref calls didn't get the ducks any love around these parts. If Stanford owned us in 2012 by winning by a field goal, they owned you in 2013, even though it was a close game decided by a few points. Keep the logic consistent.
Click to expand...

They did own us in 2013.
http://espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=332780024

The stats don't show it well but special teams and penalties screwed us over against Stanford (two of Sark's hallmarks as a coach). Montgomery had 204 yards on KOR, including a 99-yard TD and a 68-yard KOR that set up a TD 2 plays later. Barry Sander's PR in the 1Q put them deep in UW territory (but fortunately, Hogan sucks). We had 89 penalty yards but 4 of those penalties either killed our drives or kept Stanford's alive (holding on 3rd and short, hands to the face on a 3rd down stop, etc.).

We may have outgained Stanford offensively 489-279, but they outgained us in special teams and penalty yards by a drastic 332-99. That's 233 of easy yards given up by shitty coaching. That's why they owned us.

They owned us in 2013 but we know with a real football coach, the game will be significantly different here in Seattle.
Click to expand...

Downvoted for not keeping it crisp ...

Scoreboard Baby!!! is all that is needed here ...

TS, DR
 
obk likes to post fucktarded bullshit, and then he gets all butthurt when he gets called on it.

He's a complete fucking goat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top