USC needs post-loss approach to become constant
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
Sark in a nutshell. At UW, he almost always came through when things were really bleak. I can think of a few examples. The end of the 2010 season.
In 2012 after the LSU beatdown, he beat Stanford. Some doogs were wising up after the 52-17 debacle in Arizona. Then Sark beat a ranked Oregon State at home.
In 2013 it was the Oregon State game when we actually wondered (okay dreamed) that Sark could be fired if he lost that game.
USC will blow out UW, get cocky and blow a game to a shitty team. #thescript.
In 2012 after the LSU beatdown, he beat Stanford. Some doogs were wising up after the 52-17 debacle in Arizona. Then Sark beat a ranked Oregon State at home.
In 2013 it was the Oregon State game when we actually wondered (okay dreamed) that Sark could be fired if he lost that game.
USC will blow out UW, get cocky and blow a game to a shitty team. #thescript.
CokeGreaterThanPepsi
New Fish
Wanting a Sark lead team to be consistent is asking for the impossible, but he does just need more tim.
Give him 6 years, he wins 3 Natty's.
Give him 6 years, he wins 3 Natty's.
He will give the Trojans plenty of chances to work on their post loss comportment
BennyBeaver
New Fish
Didn't Sark lead the Huskies to a game day championship?
whatshouldicareabout
Active poster
7-6, 7-6, 7-6 seems pretty consistent to me