UCLA and Texas A&M announce home-and-home series

They're doing it wrong. They should be scheduling Idaho State, Southern North Dakota, Slippery Rock, et al. Getting closer to that Mora implosion day by day.
 
They're doing it wrong. They should be scheduling Idaho State, Southern North Dakota, Slippery Rock, et al. Getting closer to that Mora implosion day by day.

I know you said that tongue in cheek (or think you did), but the fact remains, the top teams yearly fudge their win loss percentages by feasting on a Slippery Rock. One of the two teams in the match-up is going to come out with a big fat L in the column.
 
They're doing it wrong. They should be scheduling Idaho State, Southern North Dakota, Slippery Rock, et al. Getting closer to that Mora implosion day by day.

I know you said that tongue in cheek (or think you did), but the fact remains, the top teams yearly fudge their win loss percentages by feasting on a Slippery Rock. One of the two teams in the match-up is going to come out with a big fat L in the column.

post johny football, A&M might need to get used to many big fat Ls. I think UCLA has more to lose in this arrangement.
 
They're doing it wrong. They should be scheduling Idaho State, Southern North Dakota, Slippery Rock, et al. Getting closer to that Mora implosion day by day.

I know you said that tongue in cheek (or think you did), but the fact remains, the top teams yearly fudge their win loss percentages by feasting on a Slippery Rock. One of the two teams in the match-up is going to come out with a big fat L in the column.

Ron_Fairly (RIP) would have approved this statement
 
They're doing it wrong. They should be scheduling Idaho State, Southern North Dakota, Slippery Rock, et al. Getting closer to that Mora implosion day by day.

I know you said that tongue in cheek (or think you did), but the fact remains, the top teams yearly fudge their win loss percentages by feasting on a Slippery Rock. One of the two teams in the match-up is going to come out with a big fat L in the column.

post johny football, A&M might need to get used to many big fat Ls. I think UCLA has more to lose in this arrangement.

Disagree
 
What do you mean? Rutgers is the kind of team you pay big money to see. And there's nothing like Newark and Piscataway on a crisp fall afternoon.
 
According to PL_SSFS any Pac 12 team would go 7-10 against any SEC team. The SEC is overrated, the Pac is underrated. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.
 
According to PL_SSFS any Pac 12 team would go 7-10 against any SEC team.The SEC is overrated, the Pac is underrated. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.

Correct.

Puppy Steelheader and I were mocked for pointing that out throughout last season, but in the end, we were vindicated.
 
According to PL_SSFS any Pac 12 team would go 7-10 against any SEC team.The SEC is overrated, the Pac is underrated. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.

Correct.

Puppy Steelheader and I were mocked for pointing that out throughout last season, but in the end, we were vindicated.
Yes, the Pac really proved itself superior to the SEC in the end.

Huh?

 
According to PL_SSFS any Pac 12 team would go 7-10 against any SEC team.The SEC is overrated, the Pac is underrated. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.

Correct.

Puppy Steelheader and I were mocked for pointing that out throughout last season, but in the end, we were vindicated.
Yes, the Pac really proved itself superior to the SEC in the end.

Huh?

Maybe not, but the SEC has beem overrated for years, while the Pac 10/12 hasn't received its due.
 
According to PL_SSFS any Pac 12 team would go 7-10 against any SEC team.The SEC is overrated, the Pac is underrated. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.

Correct.

Puppy Steelheader and I were mocked for pointing that out throughout last season, but in the end, we were vindicated.
Yes, the Pac really proved itself superior to the SEC in the end.

Huh?

Maybe not, but the SEC has beem overrated for years, while the Pac 10/12 hasn't received its due.

Win 7 straight NC's, then pop off
 
Back
Top