There is an entire thread on Doogman devoted to slandering Don James' strength of schedule

Gladstone

New Fish
In a vain attempt to prop up our .500 fat frat boy coach

I want to reach through my monitor and strangle every last one of them. One of the other 17 guys who use this DM account told me that Kim has been extra ban-happy recently, so I dare not post. So now the doog defense is (1) logical fallacy 101 "LOL WHO WOULD YOU REPLACE HIM WITH THEN? YEAH DIDN'T THINK SO" and (2) ripping on James' achievements to make Sark look better.

My mind honestly cannot comprehend the level of stupidity. Every time I reach the "fuck this fanbase" nadir, I find myself surprised and the bar lowered even more. Also: where the fuck is YaleDawg? He seemed ready to flip his shit after Stanford and not a peep since.

I expect breathtaking stupidity from people like Kim and Ektard, but please tell me those other doogish "let it play out bro u dont know how hard sark haz had it" drones don't represent the majority of our fanbase right? Right? Public Ivy my ass. I take some small comfort in that literally all of my friends and former schoolmates I keep in contact with universally revile Sark, although it took some of them until ASU to get it. So maybe DM isn't representative of the fanbase as a whole.

But seriously, every time I see someone defend Sark with middle school PHIL 101 logical fallacy posts I just

tumblr_m22y1hHU7A1r8d2mio1_400.gif


 
Sadly, I think Doogfarm is pretty indicative of the fanbase. How do you explain Pool Boy and Bag of Dicks still having jobs otherwise?
 
If this fanbase thinks what we have now is comparable to James then Pool Boy has won.
 
Only one thing to respond with:

This is why, when Sports Illustrated named the three best college coaches in the country one fall, the magazine's list was: No. 1, Don James; No. 2, Don James; No. 3, Don James.


Don James was simply the best.

End of discussion.
 
Only one thing to respond with:

This is why, when Sports Illustrated named the three best college coaches in the country one fall, the magazine's list was: No. 1, Don James; No. 2, Don James; No. 3, Don James.


Don James was simply the best.

End of discussion.

If you choose to exclude where Sports Illustrated ranks Sark in that discussion, you may have an agenda

 
James OOC ranked opponents:

1975: vs #8 Texas: L 28-10
1975: at #7 Alabama: L 52-0

1977: vs #16 Mississippi State L 27-18
1977: vs #4 Michigan W 27-20(Rose Bowl)

1978: vs #8 Alabama L 20-17

1979: vs #17 Pittsburgh L 26-12
1979: vs #11 Texas W 14-7(Sun Bowl)

1980: vs #5 Michigan L 23-6(Rose Bowl)

1981: vs #13 Iowa W 28-0(Rose Bowl)

1982: vs #16 Maryland W 21-20(Aloha Bowl)

1983: vs #8 Michigan W 25-24

1984: at #3 Michigan W 20-11
1984: vs #2 Oklahoma W 28-17(Orange Bowl)

1985: vs #16 Oklahoma State L 31-17
1985: at #16 BYU L 31-3

1986: vs #10 Ohio State W 40-7
1986 vs #11 BYU W 52-21
1986 vs #13 Alabama L 28-6(Sun Bowl)

1989: vs #5 Colorado L 45-28

1990: at #20 Colorado L 20-14
1990: vs #17 Iowa W 46-34(Rose Bowl)

1991: at #9 Nebraska W 36-21
1991: vs #4 Michigan W 34-14(Rose Bowl)

1992: vs #12 Nebraska W 29-14
1992: vs #7 Michigan L 38-31

Meanwhile here is Sark against ranked OOC

2009: vs #11 LSU L 31-23

2010: vs #8 Nebraska L 56-21
2010: vs #16 Nebraska W 19-7(Holiday Bowl)

2011: at #11 Nebraska L 51-38
2011: vs #15 Baylor L 67-56(Alamo Bowl)

2012: at #3 LSU L 41-3
2012: vs #20 Boise State L 28-26(Vegas Bowl)

2013: vs #19 Boise State W 38-6

Is the SOS even a fucking debate?! Fuck Doogs are pressing hard core.
 
I say, back out the D-1AA victories for both coaches and re-run the numbers.

let's see what the facts tell us.

Or just use the conference records.

That's even easier.

James lost 4 or more conference games twice in 18 years.

Sark has lost 4 or more conference games every year so far.
 
Last edited:
If you try to engage one of these nut jobs one on one respectfully ... Say with the IN-BOX feature they either ignore you, try to ridicule you or tell on you to Kimberly, F3 or Ektard.
 
Back
Top