doogsinparadise
New Fish
Swallowing everything that Peterman will do before he actually does it. He'll make a few mistakes just like any coach, don't be a sloppy dicklicker. High standards please.
The new Doog
- Thread starter doogsinparadise
- Start date
Most people here aren't gonna cut him any slack in his first year in the Pac, with a lack of experience at some positions (and justifiably so). One of the things that I at least am swallowing is his competence in putting a team together. We've gone over what he's done in the last couple months so I won't rehash it. Hell, when is the last time we've won some key recruiting battles over OSU and Oregon in the same fucking year? I think this coach deserves the benefit of the doubt for now. My senior year at UW was Sark's first, and the whole situation just reeked of over-hyped California bullshit that the doogpounders like to call "giving hope back to the program." Petersen has been all-business since he's arrived.
Passion
New Fish
When Sark would recruit a 2-star "diamond in the rough," I thought the kid was screwed. In fact, I even thought that about some of the higher-ranked recruits.
When CP brings in a 2-star "diamond in the rough" I actually feel like the kid might develop into something.
Some people might call that "doogin." I call it an understanding of CP's track record.
When CP brings in a 2-star "diamond in the rough" I actually feel like the kid might develop into something.
Some people might call that "doogin." I call it an understanding of CP's track record.
CuntWaffle
New Fish
Pressing
I thought the new doog is the person who was convinced Sark was going to bring in a top 5 recruiting class and thinks we need a staff of 25 year old coaches who use catchphrases that mean nothing and open up all practices to embrace the community.
dnc
New Fish
I like to pretend all coaches are created equal.
Hire an intern, he better prove himself.
Hire a proven coach, he gets the benefit of the doubt.
If and when Petersen starts fucking stuff up, I'll criticize. Until then, I'm going to continue to enjoy the fact we have the best coach in the Northwest and top 3 in the conference for the first time since before the Patriot Act.
#HiNSA!
Every thread
Sarkingham
New Fish
The new doogs are the people that blindly supported every single thing that Dude Brah did but are now questioning whether or not Petermen can get it done in the Pac12.
In other words, the new doogs are the same as the old doogs.
In other words, the new doogs are the same as the old doogs.
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
LEAVE!
dnc
New Fish
HRYK
These are the people who:
- Loved Lambo (#HiPLSS!)
- Hated Rick With The Rose Bowl.
- Loved Gilby and his TUFF questions.
- Loved Ty for cleaning up the program.
- Loved Rick Without the Rose Bowel.
= Aren't sure about Petersen.
Given their track record, I'd guess they're the ones who would have fired Don James after year 3/1988/abundance
CuntWaffle
New Fish
Well he certainly is no Leach that is for sure but he is a lot better than Sark.
puppylove_sugarsteel
Asshole Emeritus
"Hell, when is the last time we've won some key recruiting battles over OSU and Oregon in the same fucking year? "
Uh, when you were in like middle school we beat there ass like every year. We still kick OSU's ass in recruiting for the most part. .
" this coach deserves the benefit of the doubt for now. My senior year at UW was Sark's first..."
No shit?
Uh, when you were in like middle school we beat there ass like every year. We still kick OSU's ass in recruiting for the most part. .
" this coach deserves the benefit of the doubt for now. My senior year at UW was Sark's first..."
No shit?
HeretoBeatmyChest
New Fish
Swing and a miss.
We know what we have. But its fine for you to think otherwise if you want.
creepycoug
Well-known poster
agree with that and agree w/ Race. Peterman has enough of a track record that he gets the benefit of the doubt. no doubt. and it's clear we have a grown up running things now. it was just as clear from the get-go that we didn't before.
one tiny little bit of doubt that lingers for me is this: he did what he did in totally different conference context than the Pac 12, and I thought Hawkins was a great coach too. not being negative, just observing the obvious there.
that said, yeah, there's reason to assume better things are on the way.
a doog is a doog is a doog. doesn't matter what era it is. there were Willingham doogs, if you can actually take yourself back far enough in time.
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
Obvious correction.
We know Peterman will do just as well as SWS, and there's a 95% chance he will do better, incl. some ten win seasons, and probably a RB and top ten season every 3-5 years if not more frequently. Of course there's a chance of failure, but it seems very unlikely.
CuntWaffle
New Fish
If coaching hires were always nothing but a pure crap shoot, schools would hire interns or assistant coaches and pay them bottom dollar.
Peetamus has a proven track record of winning big games and coaching up talent with the best.
The whole "He may be a better coach at small schools like BSU because he can't handle the pressure of big conference football" argument is one of the most fucking stupid things I have ever heard in my entire life. If you actually believe this shit please douse yourself in gasoline, ignite, and on the brink of death hurl yourself off the Aurora Bridge. Peterman might end up not working out but it won't be because of this fucking ridiculous narrative.
People also need to learn the difference between being optimistic and claiming National Titles and Rose Bowls. Don't get expecting 10+ wins a season twisted with claiming it will already happen.
I would say the mood right now around here is a very very optimistic LIPO. A lot of that was triggered by the fact that everyone thought fat fuck dude brah was going to be the UW coach for another 5+ years after Leach couldn't finish the job.
Peetamus has a proven track record of winning big games and coaching up talent with the best.
The whole "He may be a better coach at small schools like BSU because he can't handle the pressure of big conference football" argument is one of the most fucking stupid things I have ever heard in my entire life. If you actually believe this shit please douse yourself in gasoline, ignite, and on the brink of death hurl yourself off the Aurora Bridge. Peterman might end up not working out but it won't be because of this fucking ridiculous narrative.
People also need to learn the difference between being optimistic and claiming National Titles and Rose Bowls. Don't get expecting 10+ wins a season twisted with claiming it will already happen.
I would say the mood right now around here is a very very optimistic LIPO. A lot of that was triggered by the fact that everyone thought fat fuck dude brah was going to be the UW coach for another 5+ years after Leach couldn't finish the job.