Those teams outscored Sark's great offense 170-107, for an average score of 43-27.
The combined record of the teams that have beaten Washington is 35-10
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
fivehundredmileDAWG
New Fish
There's quite a bit of incremental progress in this statistic. If you can't see that this team is better i can't help you.
You can't expect Sark in his 5th year to beat teams with good records.
How soon do people forget that Sark took over an oh-and-twelve team.
that's the spirit
topdawgnc
New Fish
Dick,
Rumor has it you hope Sark's recent win over Oregon State will be enough to calm the critics.
How can you look at Sark's full body of work, and justify the fact he is the highest paid coach in the Pac12 and should not be replaced?
It is year five and his teams have actually regressed from their heights set 4 years ago. There is no competing for championships ... at any level, and the bowl selection has gotten worse. He's reached 7 wins during the regular season for the third straight year, and considering the tear Wazzu is on and Sark's history in bowls, making it to win 8 or 9 is not going to be easy.
Some like to point to 0-12 .. I prefer to hold him to the standard of winning a Holiday Bowl in year 2. It shows the talent was here and 0-12 was a symptom of the true cause ... players quitting on Tyrone Willingham.
I am also a little embarrassed at this year's schedule (Idaho State ... really?) ... and next year's is a complete joke.
If I was at Colorado, Colorado State, Idaho, Cal, or even Wazzu ... Sark would be my guy. Seven wins and a trip to the Jumpin' Jalapeno Toilet Bowl is a great season. But this is Washington ... and our history, tradition, and expectations calls for Rose Bowls ... not every year ... but dammit ... we should be competing for the Roses late into November ... not knocked out in early October.
Three game skids, blow out loses to Arizona schools, and being #1 in penalties is not Washington football.
