The case for LIFPO

Since Auburndoog is too lazy, I did some research on offensive and defensive starters.

The 2010 opening day depth chart, by class:
9 seniors
9 juniors
5 sophomores
0 freshmen

The 2013 opening day depth chart, by class:
6 seniors
11 juniors
4 sophomores
1 freshman

NOTE: The numbers add up to 23 because Sark likes listing an extra WR on the depth chart.

Summary: If UW was too young in 2010, it's still too young in 2013.
 
So, Sark has a veteran squad in 2013 composed mostly of upperclassmen at least in starting roles with some experience in backup positions. How do you explain the record setting penalties in the past two games? Upperclassmen have been around long enough to avoid such brain cramping or lack of focus, especially after playing their first game against a ranked opponent without such errors.

I watched ten seasons of Husky Football coached by Jim Owens and although he wasn't at times the most disciplined of coaches, I don't recall any of his teams, not even his frosh or JV squads being penalized 16 times in a single contest. As for Don James......well, with 10 flags in the first two quarters, the Dawgfather would've had his entire roster running stairs at halftime.

Upperclass usually means more experience which typically results in fewer mistakes....... if it's coached with the skill we should expect. Enough said about LIFPO when watching Husky Football with RCPAG.
 
If your team only wins when it has junior and senior starters, your head coach is Mike Price fucking stupid and needs to be fired.
 
If your team only wins when it has junior and senior starters, your head coach is Mike Price fucking stupid and needs to be fired.
Click to expand...

Doogs think Mike Price is a good coach though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top