Auburn's defense was near the bottom in the SEC that year, everyone including Thomas was able to throw the ball on them. Alabama's defense is vastly superior, they would swallow Oregon whole.
Ted Miller FS
- Thread starter PurpleJ
- Start date
Auburn's defense was near the bottom in the SEC that year, everyone including Thomas was able to throw the ball on them. Alabama's defense is vastly superior, they would swallow Oregon whole.
creepycoug
Well-known poster
You know this much about bamers D after one game? Ohio state shut out wisky. Why couldn't bamers do it?
I'll wait and see. Oregon's offense has more weapons now than in 2011 even with Tyner out.
Swallowing whole means pitching a shutout or thereabouts. It doesnt mean 20 and Oregon could easily score 3 TDs on any SEC team, even with limited TOP.
Look at Alabama's results last year. 5 FIVE fucking teams put 20+ on them not including OSU. Florida was an abortion of an offense and managed to do it on the road and a 7-6 Tennessee team put 20 on them. Ole miss and West Virginia hit 23 and auburn hung 44 pts.
Oregon would do so (hit at least 21) rather easily. Best evidence of that is what Florida and Auburn did to them.
I still don't trust the Bama defense.
BallSacked
New Fish
It's not loaded top to bottom. That's for sure.
It's a great defense for 5 or 10 years ago. It is loaded top to bottom for the NFL.
But the spread is the
creepycoug
Well-known poster
It's a great defense for 5 or 10 years ago. It is loaded top to bottom for the NFL.
But the spread is the
One word: Will Muschamp.
