Study: Earth was warmer in Roman, Medieval times

Race logic isn't really a strong point for these boreds. Just say there is overwhelming evidence yet not poast a link, that is how this baby operates/

Ok. How about an independent study that found skeptics' claims unfounded?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=three-quarters-of-climate
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15373071
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/21/world/americas/climate-study-warming-real/index.html

Here are some graphs

GHGConc2000-large.jpg


peak-oil-graph.jpg


bad7.bmp


I particularly like this one because there have been posts recently about the ice returning. If you look at the overall trend this anomaly has happened in the past, but the overall decline continues.

arctic_sea_ice_august_2012.png


There's plenty more beyond this.

A warm earth is better for us. So we have that going for us which is nice. None of us want to give up the great life carbon gives us. That's my complaint- I don't like making it more expensive for no practical reason. Or even five reasons.

The oil companies that are villified will be the companies that actually succeed in alt energy because they will make it profitable. I mock Gore because he represents a movement that squanders billions on losers like Solandra.

Two things that will never be free - healthcare and energy

Ocean Acidification disagrees. In fact, there are numerous consequences of a warmer earth.

The problem is the great life carbon gives us is coming to an end. It is practical to find renewable solutions for long term health of not just the energy industry but mankind.

Agree on the last part. Look at Tesla as an example. Exxon's foray into Algae research shows that is also in line with your statement.http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Biofuels/Exxons-100m-Algae-Investment-Falls-Flat.html

But the problem is these big companies are still, for the most part, ignoring it, paving the way for an energy crisis.

Hey dipshit, would you believe NASA?
naturalnews.com/040448_solar_radiation_global_warming_debunked.html

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 
I am not going to go to the efforts of CollegeDoog BUT

I have a PhD in geophysics (aka I actually understand this shit unlike a lot of you third brains who parrot whatever you want to hear).
I work in the oil industry.
I can assure you anthropogenic global warming is completely real.
 
I am not going to go to the efforts of CollegeDoog BUT

I have a PhD in geophysics (aka I actually understand this shit unlike a lot of you third brains who parrot whatever you want to hear).
I work in the oil industry.
I can assure you anthropogenic global warming is completely real.

Geophysics superiority guy
 
Up here at 30,000 feet posting on my phone I can't address your post how I'd like to but a couple points:

1. The politicization of the issue is sad but both sides are guilty of it. Instead of trying to resolve the issue they're caught up in a game of semantics going nowhere.

2. One hurricane season isn't isolated? El Oh Fucking El. We've literally seen unprecedented hurricanes, tornadoes, and snowstorms over the last 15 years and you use this hurricane season to counter that? C'mon man. Plus that Typhoon (which is the same fucking thing as a hurricane happened this year).

3. So because other countries aren't stopping means it's ok for us to continue on a path of belligerence? I miss America the world leader dammit!

Jesus Christ, no. Nothing is fucking happening. Weather goes in cycles, people only started noticing all this shit when libs were screaming "LOOK!!! HURRICANE!! CAUSED BY GLOBA.... ehh heh... CLIMATE CHANGE." When the weather has a stretch of being extremely mild will the excuse be "Even Climate Change has down time" ??

There is a mountain of scientific evidence supporting climate change. Just because some people exaggerated it for political purposes doesn't debunk the years and years of research and scientific support.

When did Americans become so fucking polarized and shallow?

There are also just as much if not way fucking more evidence to prove that it is all bullshit.

What? CLIMATEGATE!!??!? Or whatever grand "exposé" that showed s few scientists tried to silence others?

The evidence against is mostly politicization like changing the name. They can critique the semantics but not the actual fucking data.

And please if you're gonna bring data to the table it better not be from the dailycaller, red state.com, breitbart, or studies paid for by climate change denial groups.

So, only data from Democrat administrations paying scientists to come to conclusions that add to their funding next year are acceptable?

figure-7-3.png


When did the lesson "Question Authority", become "Question only the authority that doesn't support your position, you racist bastard" ???

I looked up HADSST3, your source for that graph and found their conclusions actually refuted what you posted. How's it feel to be an incompetent fucktard who falls for lies?

25prevn.jpg

 
Back
Top