CuntWaffle
New Fish
Thoughts?
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry for your loss boobs.
You know how to use Google
Then why did people say the first video was proof he was a victim of racial profiling if this one is inconclusive?
Then why did people say the first video was proof he was a victim of racial profiling if this one is inconclusive?
As Deadspin said, people see what they want to see rather than what is.
Most of us here are guilty of that.
The police reviewed it and found that the police did nothing wrong.
On a side note I have reviewed my own sexual prowess and rated it a 10 out of 10.
The police reviewed it and found that the police did nothing wrong.
On a side note I have reviewed my own sexual prowess and rated it a 10 out of 10.
Link?
The police reviewed it and found that the police did nothing wrong.
On a side note I have reviewed my own sexual prowess and rated it a 10 out of 10.
Link?
The police reviewed it and found that the police did nothing wrong.
On a side note I have reviewed my own sexual prowess and rated it a 10 out of 10.
The police reviewed it and found that the police did nothing wrong.
On a side note I have reviewed my own sexual prowess and rated it a 10 out of 10.
Link?
Fine. It appears the video was chinconclusive. Since no one wins, everyone lets the situation die quietly:https://deadspin.com/new-michael-bennett-video-shows-exactly-whatever-you-wa-1819024503
The police reviewed it and found that the police did nothing wrong.
On a side note I have reviewed my own sexual prowess and rated it a 10 out of 10.
Link?
Fine. It appears the video was chinconclusive. Since no one wins, everyone lets the situation die quietly:https://deadspin.com/new-michael-bennett-video-shows-exactly-whatever-you-wa-1819024503
I was referring to APAG's sexual prowess, dipshit