Sinceredawg with post of year

I'm going to need more context. Are you knew here?
 
If you are going to come here and throw hints, you better back it up.

Next time, there will be no warning. You'll just be gone.
 
A poaster discussing PAC 12 Playboy issue and how UWs rep is the only one wearing clothes. Husky lawyer puts up a pic of his wife. Sinceredawg, thinking she was the PAC 12 rep for UW, wrote:

Thanks for posting. But as for the girl.....ew. I wouldn't touch that nasty

Then you watch him backtrack when he learns he called his wife a nasty. Funny stuff. Surprised it wasn't deleted.

Now fuck off.
 
A poaster discussing PAC 12 Playboy issue and how UWs rep is the only one wearing clothes. Husky lawyer puts up a pic of his wife. Sinceredawg, thinking she was the PAC 12 rep for UW, wrote:

Thanks for posting. But as for the girl.....ew. I wouldn't touch that nasty

Then you watch him backtrack when he learns he called his wife a nasty. Funny stuff. Surprised it wasn't deleted.

Now fuck off.
Click to expand...

Had this story been included in your OP, you would not have seen scorn and derision. Crisp your shit up and you might work out. Warning stands.
 
A poaster discussing PAC 12 Playboy issue and how UWs rep is the only one wearing clothes. Husky lawyer puts up a pic of his wife. Sinceredawg, thinking she was the PAC 12 rep for UW, wrote:

Thanks for posting. But as for the girl.....ew. I wouldn't touch that nasty

Then you watch him backtrack when he learns he called his wife a nasty. Funny stuff. Surprised it wasn't deleted.

Now fuck off.
Click to expand...

Had this story been included in your OP, you would not have seen scorn and derision. Crisp your shit up and you might work out. Warning stands.
Click to expand...

Disagree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top