And it always seems to come back to...
"But dude, we were 0-12."
Look, that might actually be a consideration (certainly not in year 5 but previously) if the 0-12 HC wasn't an inept cock sucker who seemed to purposely try to lose that last year as a final FY.
And it always seems to come back to...
"But dude, we were 0-12."
Look, that might actually be a consideration (certainly not in year 5 but previously) if the 0-12 HC wasn't an inept cock sucker who seemed to purposely try to lose that last year as a final FY.
I never bought the 0-12 excuse but I tolerated it the first two years. After the Holiday Bowl win the 0-12 excuse should have died forever.
0-12 is just as relevant as 12-0 back in 1991. Not one player on this roster was part of 0-12 and if you can go 7-6 in year two then there is no excuse to not win 10 in year five.
I walked into green lantern in WW for game .... Guy saw 'W' on my car and tried to Doog it up with me ... I told him I am for the players .. But hate the coach ... "No bark for Sark Brah...?" ... "No" I says ..
I told him to look up sarks conference record and conference record on the road ... He said"yeah... But we are getting there... "
... I'm now siting by myself under he old 'cougar Inn' sign (the coug) .. No cougs or doogs like me ..
And it always seems to come back to...
"But dude, we were 0-12."
Look, that might actually be a consideration (certainly not in year 5 but previously) if the 0-12 HC wasn't an inept cock sucker who seemed to purposely try to lose that last year as a final FY.
I never bought the 0-12 excuse but I tolerated it the first two years. After the Holiday Bowl win the 0-12 excuse should have died forever.
0-12 is just as relevant as 12-0 back in 1991. Not one player on this roster was part of 0-12 and if you can go 7-6 in year two then there is no excuse to not win 10 in year five.
Keep that talk up and Sark might stop turning down the Tampa Bays and USCs of the world.