Seahawks must plan for the future without Marshawn Lynch

They do have to figure out the post Lynch years. I think Turban is better than many think. I'm not very high an Michael and think that was a bad pick.

I would be uneasy about spending an early pick on a RB, but a RB should probably be chosen in this year's draft.

As important as Lynch is, if you get better WR's, Russell Wilson should be able to handle throwing the ball more. I think that is how you replace Lynch's production because it is hard to find a RB as good.
 
Terry Blount sucks. Most of those NFL Nation guys are actually pretty good, but Blount's pieces are always super generic and basically write themselves.

The Seahawks need to prepare for a future without their 29 year old running back with back issues?

WIW.
 
They do have to figure out the post Lynch years. I think Turban is better than many think. I'm not very high an Michael and think that was a bad pick.

I would be uneasy about spending an early pick on a RB, but a RB should probably be chosen in this year's draft.

As important as Lynch is, if you get better WR's, Russell Wilson should be able to handle throwing the ball more. I think that is how you replace Lynch's production because it is hard to find a RB as good.
Click to expand...
MIchael's looked pretty good when he's played, he just never plays. My guess is he sucks as a receiver and/or pass protector. I'm not sure if Turbin's any good in pass protection but he's very good as a receiver.

One of the things nobody talks about is how it will affect the read option once Lynch is gone. There was a high frequency of "mesh point" issues causes bobbles and/or fumbles whenever Russell ran the read option with one of the backups. Presumably that gets better with added reps and comfortability with one another, but it's no guarantee.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top