AZDuck
New Fish
Let em' have it:
http://on.scout.com/zLc29
http://on.scout.com/zLc29
Thanks for the link, @AZDuck. I just took a huge dump on them. I also suggested they fire the people who run dawgman.com.
Thanks for the link, @AZDuck. I just took a huge dump on them. I also suggested they fire the people who run dawgman.com.
Scout works for them, it's not the other way around.
So this what I'm hearing....while you support scout.com you are against you are against the individual sites.
Thanks for the link, @AZDuck. I just took a huge dump on them. I also suggested they fire the people who run dawgman.com.
Scout works for them, it's not the other way around.
Thanks for the link, @AZDuck. I just took a huge dump on them. I also suggested they fire the people who run dawgman.com.
I did the same. Told them I would go back to their service if they get rid of the Dawgman.com ownership. I won't of course, but whatever.
It's always fun to hear traces of the thinly veiled contempt in the voices of the national scout guys when they are guests on the doogman show.
They should start by firing this guy
![]()
On all 119 sites.
Thanks for the link, @AZDuck. I just took a huge dump on them. I also suggested they fire the people who run dawgman.com.
Scout works for them, it's not the other way around.
My favorite moment from the short time I was a paying member of doogman was when I asked Kim about that after their relaunch. He never answered and he sent me to time out.
I have no problem with scout as a website and a service. It's the cockgobblers they pick to run their sites locally that suck.