I said they'd wriggle out of it.@hhusky said Trump would win but only because of extreme MAGA court. Not because of legal argument.
Wriggle out of it by directly addressing what the 14th Amendment actually states versus what you phony lawyers want it to mean.I said they'd wriggle out of it.@hhusky said Trump would win but only because of extreme MAGA court. Not because of legal argument.
They did.
Lots of logical problems with using Section 5 to say Congress has the exclusive power to enforce the amendment's provisions—plus the nagging problem that it doesn't say that at all.Wriggle out of it by directly addressing what the 14th Amendment actually states versus what you phony lawyers want it to mean.I said they'd wriggle out of it.@hhusky said Trump would win but only because of extreme MAGA court. Not because of legal argument.
They did.
Another day, another L for the fake attorney.
9-0 is a big L for you. Case closed.Lots of logical problems with using Section 5 to say Congress has the exclusive power to enforce the amendment's provisions—plus the nagging problem that it doesn't say that at all.Wriggle out of it by directly addressing what the 14th Amendment actually states versus what you phony lawyers want it to mean.I said they'd wriggle out of it.@hhusky said Trump would win but only because of extreme MAGA court. Not because of legal argument.
They did.
Another day, another L for the fake attorney.
It's over your pretty little head, Chrissy. Don't fret.
Anyway, I was right again.
You were sucking off the Colorado "trial".What L? I've already said it's better for the country that he be on the ballot. I just wondered how they'd get off the hook.
This is loser talk. Coach Lake here just needs more tim, though.What L? I've already said it's better for the country that he be on the ballot. I just wondered how they'd get off the hook.
Trump was convicted of insurrectionYou were sucking off the Colorado "trial".What L? I've already said it's better for the country that he be on the ballot. I just wondered how they'd get off the hook.
Sure you are. Even the Supreme commies didn't side with you. What's worse than a commie? Dumbshits!Lots of logical problems with using Section 5 to say Congress has the exclusive power to enforce the amendment's provisions—plus the nagging problem that it doesn't say that at all.Wriggle out of it by directly addressing what the 14th Amendment actually states versus what you phony lawyers want it to mean.I said they'd wriggle out of it.@hhusky said Trump would win but only because of extreme MAGA court. Not because of legal argument.
They did.
Another day, another L for the fake attorney.
It's over your pretty little head, Chrissy. Don't fret.
Anyway, I was right again.