Rollllball

FreeChavez

FreeChavez

Active poster
Gotta say, the decision to sit your leading scorer for all 5 minutes of OT was just brilliant watson. Double down on that by realizing that UW scored a grand total of ZERO fast break points on the night. Zero.

Lifetime contract
 
That was one of the worst coaches games I have ever seen out of Romar. That is saying a lot because he isn't a very good coach. Sitting Kemp for 10+ minutes in the first half with two fouls was just as bad. We went a very long time without a FG. I think it might have been worth taking a risk with 4-5 minutes left.
 
That was one of the worst coaches games I have ever seen out of Romar. That is saying a lot because he isn't a very good coach. Sitting Kemp for 10+ minutes in the first half with two fouls was just as bad. We went a very long time without a FG. I think it might have been worth taking a risk with 4-5 minutes left.
Click to expand...

The whole idea of sitting someone b/c they have 2 fouls is pretty ridiculous in itself. You're just as likely to get a third foul in the first 10 seconds of the second half as you to get a third foul with 5 minutes to go in the 1st half. I hate when coaches do that for super long stretches. IF he gets a third, fine. You sit him. Otherwise let the guy play so we have someone who can score on the floor.
 
That was one of the worst coaches games I have ever seen out of Romar. That is saying a lot because he isn't a very good coach. Sitting Kemp for 10+ minutes in the first half with two fouls was just as bad. We went a very long time without a FG. I think it might have been worth taking a risk with 4-5 minutes left.
Click to expand...

The whole idea of sitting someone b/c they have 2 fouls is pretty ridiculous in itself. You're just as likely to get a third foul in the first 10 seconds of the second half as you to get a third foul with 5 minutes to go in the 1st half. I hate when coaches do that for super long stretches. IF he gets a third, fine. You sit him. Otherwise let the guy play so we have someone who can score on the floor.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I get what dumb fuck Romar was thinking. Jarreau had 3 fouls and Romar didn't want to get stuck late in the game with Upshaw as the only big. It backfired though and when your team is going who knows how many minutes without a FG, you put the guy who scored 10 of your first 14 points back in the game.
 
That was one of the worst coaches games I have ever seen out of Romar. That is saying a lot because he isn't a very good coach. Sitting Kemp for 10+ minutes in the first half with two fouls was just as bad. We went a very long time without a FG. I think it might have been worth taking a risk with 4-5 minutes left.
Click to expand...

The whole idea of sitting someone b/c they have 2 fouls is pretty ridiculous in itself. You're just as likely to get a third foul in the first 10 seconds of the second half as you to get a third foul with 5 minutes to go in the 1st half. I hate when coaches do that for super long stretches. IF he gets a third, fine. You sit him. Otherwise let the guy play so we have someone who can score on the floor.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I get what dumb fuck Romar was thinking. Jarreau had 3 fouls and Romar didn't want to get stuck late in the game with Upshaw as the only big. It backfired though and when your team is going who knows how many minutes without a FG, you put the guy who scored 10 of your first 14 points back in the game.
Click to expand...

Well, and it also makes no sense that you're busy protecting fouls of a guy(ie kemp) who you don't even play in OT. So obviously he wasn't THAT important to the gameplan right????
 
That was one of the worst coaches games I have ever seen out of Romar. That is saying a lot because he isn't a very good coach. Sitting Kemp for 10+ minutes in the first half with two fouls was just as bad. We went a very long time without a FG. I think it might have been worth taking a risk with 4-5 minutes left.
Click to expand...

The whole idea of sitting someone b/c they have 2 fouls is pretty ridiculous in itself. You're just as likely to get a third foul in the first 10 seconds of the second half as you to get a third foul with 5 minutes to go in the 1st half. I hate when coaches do that for super long stretches. IF he gets a third, fine. You sit him. Otherwise let the guy play so we have someone who can score on the floor.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I get what dumb fuck Romar was thinking. Jarreau had 3 fouls and Romar didn't want to get stuck late in the game with Upshaw as the only big. It backfired though and when your team is going who knows how many minutes without a FG, you put the guy who scored 10 of your first 14 points back in the game.
Click to expand...

Well, and it also makes no sense that you're busy protecting fouls of a guy(ie kemp) who you don't even play in OT. So obviously he wasn't THAT important to the gameplan right????
Click to expand...

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!
 
I assumed Kemp had fouled out when he didnt play at all in the ot. Just FS.

My buddy sent me a text with about a minute and a half left when we were up 4, saying he could feel a unbelievably painful loss coming.

Pay the man his money...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top