ThomasFremont
New Fish
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
TIA
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
WhyCantWeHaveBoth.gif
Our next coach will need to run these players off the team to get his guys in
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
Thought this was the one part of the forum that actually looked at shit in a serious way.
Recruiting matters.
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
Thought this was the one part of the forum that actually looked at shit in a serious way.
Recruiting matters.
Yeah, it's more important than coaching.
Just ask USC, Texas and Florida recently.
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
Thought this was the one part of the forum that actually looked at shit in a serious way.
Recruiting matters.
Yeah, it's more important than coaching.
Just ask USC, Texas and Florida recently.
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
Thought this was the one part of the forum that actually looked at shit in a serious way.
Recruiting matters.
Yeah, it's more important than coaching.
Just ask USC, Texas and Florida recently.
...and Ohio State and Alabama.
There you go again.
@NeGgaPlEaSe never said recruiting was more important than coaching.
But at least you firmly predicted that Washington will win 5-7 games in 2016 and 2017...enjoyed a belly laugh at that one and now have all the screenshots I need.
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
Thought this was the one part of the forum that actually looked at shit in a serious way.
Recruiting matters.
Yeah, it's more important than coaching.
Just ask USC, Texas and Florida recently.
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
Thought this was the one part of the forum that actually looked at shit in a serious way.
Recruiting matters.
Yeah, it's more important than coaching.
Just ask USC, Texas and Florida recently.
...and Ohio State and Alabama.
Exactly, the 2 schools with good coaches.
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
Thought this was the one part of the forum that actually looked at shit in a serious way.
Recruiting matters.
Yeah, it's more important than coaching.
Just ask USC, Texas and Florida recently.
...and Ohio State and Alabama.
Exactly, the 2 schools with good coaches.
What's the point of drooling over a bunch of teen boys that will win 5-7 games a year at UW for the forseeable future? Either you are a doog, or this is purely sexual.
TIA
Thought this was the one part of the forum that actually looked at shit in a serious way.
Recruiting matters.
Yeah, it's more important than coaching.
Just ask USC, Texas and Florida recently.
...and Ohio State and Alabama.
Exactly, the 2 schools with good coaches.
You are right. They also recruit pretty well.
The point is it's not that one is more important that the other. They both matter, and when you're really good at both, you get Alabama and Ohio State.
No one said that recruiting was more important than coaching. Got it?