PM to D2D

I realize you only have the education of an 8th grader, but I'd hope you'd realize that 10 years isn't very far back when you consider the geologic age of the earth. So in other words.... you might want more data points before trying to refute anything....
 
Hot summers: "Climate change is the reason"

Cold Winters: "Climate change is the reason"

Mild temperatures: "Climate change is the reason"

Hurricanes: "Climate change is the reason"

Tornados: "Climate change is the reason"

Etc.
 
If you can't believe a London Tabloid citing "scientist Mike Kendon from the 'Met' Office" who can you believe?

"Earlier this month the 'Met Office' predicted it would be the warmest year on record, but urged caution when dealing with figures".

"Numbers is dangerous, Missy. Best leave um to that chap Mike in the Met Office. Numbers is his wheelhouse."

71_42_popup.jpg
 
Last edited:
I realize you only have the education of an 8th grader, but I'd hope you'd realize that 10 years isn't very far back when you consider the geologic age of the earth. So in other words.... you might want more data points before trying to refute anything....

How about 500 years?
 
I realize you only have the education of an 8th grader, but I'd hope you'd realize that 10 years isn't very far back when you consider the geologic age of the earth. So in other words.... you might want more data points before trying to refute anything....

How about 500 years?

1. Ask Ozone

2. 500 years against several billion? Weatherman in 1514 ruled
 
I realize you only have the education of an 8th grader, but I'd hope you'd realize that 10 years isn't very far back when you consider the geologic age of the earth. So in other words.... you might want more data points before trying to refute anything....

How about 500 years?
500 years is less than 6 inches of a glacial core and an inch or two in adfluvial sediment cores extending 30 feet or more.

Deductive reasoning should do the rest of the math for you.

Key word... should.
 
Back
Top