Petersen's Contract: The "Woodward Clause"

PRedoubt

New Fish
"Under one provision, Petersen would get a one-year extension if Woodward is no longer the athletic director." Seattle Times

This is open to several different interpretations, and I would be interested in thoughts from the bored. One is that Petersen likes the idea of working for Woodward and is concerned about any new AD; possibly the kind hired by the infamous "Student/Faculty Committee". It "automatically extends" his contract one year if Woodward leaves. If Woodward left tomorrow, Petersen would automatically have a 6 year contract. Assuming that Woodward is happy with Petersen, and extends his contract on a regular basis, Petersen would have a 6 year contract handed to any "new" AD.

Another, is that Woodward could extend Petersen to a "refreshed" five-year contract just before he leaves, is forced out, whatever. Then it becomes a six-year deal, the day he leaves.

This appears to address the Babs/Gerberding v. Don James issue of 1993. I don't remember what Coach James' contract said in 1993, but by resigning, he likely saved Babs/Gerberding a shit-load of money. As Derek knows, Coach James had some regrets about resigning. Had he known that he might outlast "The Gerb" with a 6 year contract, he might have stayed.

Nice claws.

HTH/GFY/DB's/FU/DIAFF/SIUYA/CHIRP/GAYLORD
 
Last edited:
gadaffi-cool-story-bro-lwD29A.jpg
 
Coach James told me several times he had no regrets. "What's done is done" were his exact words.
 
Coach James told me several times he had no regrets. "What's done is done" were his exact words.

Thanks for the clarification. It was just a horrible time back then. The Gerb was incredibly jealous of Coach James. The Gerb was an ego-maniac.
 
Back
Top