Oregon has 1 rose bowl win in a century

[puppylove_sugarsteel]

Ok, 95 years. Just thought I'd remind you guys.

 

[dnc]

I like what you're trying to do here but you picked the wrong bored. Here you go.

 

[puppylove_sugarsteel]

Arizona has never been to a rose bowl. In case you're wondering

 

[haie]

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

DOOG POST O' THE WEEK!

 

[RaceBannon]

 

[HeretoBeatmyChest]

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

College football history started in 2006.

Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.

 

[whatshouldicareabout]

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

Gil Dobie and I laugh at that statement.

 

[CuntWaffle]

When one of my good buddies told me he was going to Oregon, I told him they had a great gas pumping degree ROFL!!!12!!!!!

 

[Southerndawg]

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

College football history started in 2006.

Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.

It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.

 

[dhdawg]

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

College football history started in 2006.

Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.

It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.

agree and disagree. Yes it puts way too much into blow out wins.
Winning with defense doesn't necessarily not produce blowouts though. Look at the seahawks this season

 

[greenblood]

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

College football history started in 2006.

Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.

It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.

agree and disagree. Yes it puts way too much into blow out wins.
Winning with defense doesn't necessarily not produce blowouts though. Look at the seahawks this season

In the most important game, the Seahawk defense outscored the supposedly best offense in football. That's what I saw.

 

[whlinder]

...and it was against Russell Wilson

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

Oregon also has 1 appearance in an actual BCS championship game that's won or lost on the field, not voted on and shared with other teams we've never played. Rather be us than you. Fuck off. Duckade.

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

DOOG POST O' THE MONTH!

 

[ThomasFremont]

Oregon also has 1 appearance in an actual BCS championship game that's won or lost on the field, not voted on and shared with other teams we've never played. Rather be us than you. Fuck off. Duckade.

 

[sarktastic]

You beat Sark and Ty and made t-shirts?