Bread
New Fish
https://twitter.com/RowlandRIVALS/status/1207081190949294086?s=19
When was the last time Clemson had 0 Dline in a class?
When was the last time Clemson had 0 Dline in a class?
On that Clemson path
- Thread starter Bread
- Start date
sonics1993
New Fish
Compare the talent in the south to the west, that's why we will never be Clemson.
There is no reason we can’t have top 10 classes, but there are so many more players to pull in the South than the West Coast. It’s not an excuse, it’s a reality.
sonics1993
New Fish
For UW to have a top 10 class they need to have the best instate class ever and they need to land every single one of them along with hitting most of there other targets. In the south, you can miss a lot more since theres so much talent. Plus USC needs to be terrible because if USC is on then you can forget about it.
Last edited:
When the west does have a national champion they have great lines on both sides of the ball. USC many times. UW a couple or so
USC got every great lineman out west and recruited nationally
UW got Cunningham from Virginia but the rest of the 91 team was California and Washington
You can't miss. You cant let Smalls or JT go south
And now we have Oregon to contend with
Winners will win. Losers have a great excuse as always
I really hope Jimmy is the answer. I'm not getting any younger
USC got every great lineman out west and recruited nationally
UW got Cunningham from Virginia but the rest of the 91 team was California and Washington
You can't miss. You cant let Smalls or JT go south
And now we have Oregon to contend with
Winners will win. Losers have a great excuse as always
I really hope Jimmy is the answer. I'm not getting any younger
Yep, a really good in state class along with a couple really high 4 star/5 star guys from Cali and it can be done.
AtomicDawg
Active poster
Last year plus stephon Wright and Kyle Ford is not that far off.
Or this year if we had offered Gee Scott early, taken DJ Rodgers and Banks, and had taken Levi over Peacock.
AtomicDawg
Active poster
If you go by just 247 rankings last year was a top 10 class. The year before was 13. This year could be in the top 10 or slide just outside.
CallMeBigErn
New Fish
And next year's class will be the greatest recruiting class in the history of the galaxy lol hth
Last edited:
Beno4Life
New Fish
Need Gee, Ringo, Carlton, Yary (not West), and a Flowe/Sewell (not McDonald).
You take high 3-stars and local studs like Esteen, Sawyer, and Bruener. But not middle-tier 3-stars like Smith, McDonald, and I hate to say Sunday cause I’m liking the kids story and how he plays with aggression, a la Dick, but yeah.
You take high 3-stars and local studs like Esteen, Sawyer, and Bruener. But not middle-tier 3-stars like Smith, McDonald, and I hate to say Sunday cause I’m liking the kids story and how he plays with aggression, a la Dick, but yeah.
AtomicDawg
Active poster
*insert coach* never had to deal with a ranked *insert opponent* hot take.
Did I stutter?
Brooks was three years away from the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl
We did not have to contend with Oregon in recruiting
AtomicDawg
Active poster
UCLA tried back then so whatever. There’s always an excuse. Fifo or get out the way.
Agree
There's the quook