NY Times: If it weren’t for NIL, the Idaho Vandals might have pulled off stunner over #3 Oregon

Thanks for poastsing. I was able to read half of the first sentence then it went behind a pay wall. The good news is that I was able to understand EVERYTHING the writer was going to say due to that brief into.
I thought he was going to say that 0regon wins the game due to their billion dollar NIL and that that much purchased talent couldn't lose to an Idaho.
Not so fast my friend. Idaho lost its four top players to the NIL.
Makes sense. Vandal sense.
 
Thanks for poastsing. I was able to read half of the first sentence then it went behind a pay wall. The good news is that I was able to understand EVERYTHING the writer was going to say due to that brief into.
I thought he was going to say that 0regon wins the game due to their billion dollar NIL and that that much purchased talent couldn't lose to an Idaho.
Not so fast my friend. Idaho lost its four top players to the NIL.
Makes sense. Vandal sense.
I aim to please
 
Back
Top