Next stop the Senate?

We should try and save the baby if possible and make that the law. If mom wants to give it up that’s her call. If it is healthcare like you say we’d be doing that.
What does it even mean to "save" a profoundly disabled child who will never live a normal life, and in some cases will be in severe pain, for whatever profoundly shortened life he or she has? You want to legislate that judgment? One size fits all? Whatever the cost?
It's still a life
 
We should try and save the baby if possible and make that the law. If mom wants to give it up that’s her call. If it is healthcare like you say we’d be doing that.
What does it even mean to "save" a profoundly disabled child who will never live a normal life, and in some cases will be in severe pain, for whatever profoundly shortened life he or she has? You want to legislate that judgment? One size fits all? Whatever the cost?
It's still a life
Republicans could make a better pro-life case by someday passing pro-life legislation after birth, not just before. It would show consistency.
 
Last edited:
We should try and save the baby if possible and make that the law. If mom wants to give it up that’s her call. If it is healthcare like you say we’d be doing that.
What does it even mean to "save" a profoundly disabled child who will never live a normal life, and in some cases will be in severe pain, for whatever profoundly shortened life he or she has? You want to legislate that judgment? One size fits all? Whatever the cost?
It's still a life
Which means we should require doctors to do anything and everything to prolong it no matter what? Or something else?
 
Last edited:
We should try and save the baby if possible and make that the law. If mom wants to give it up that’s her call. If it is healthcare like you say we’d be doing that.
What does it even mean to "save" a profoundly disabled child who will never live a normal life, and in some cases will be in severe pain, for whatever profoundly shortened life he or she has? You want to legislate that judgment? One size fits all? Whatever the cost?
It's still a life
Republicans could make a better pro-life case by someday passing pro-life legislation after birth, not just before. It would show consistency.
lol
 
stone-cold.gif
 
It is funny that you think you need legislation to make life worth having a child in it.
 
Not obsessed with me at all. I'm going to be a little freaked out if Chrissy asks me to play Misty for her though.
Your idiocy, along with your pathological lies, does intrigue me, Greta.
When do you get your Daddy’s PERS windfall, big time lawyer?
 
Not obsessed with me at all. I'm going to be a little freaked out if Chrissy asks me to play Misty for her though.
Your idiocy, along with your pathological lies, does intrigue me, Greta.
When do you get your Daddy’s PERS windfall, big time lawyer?
Again, anything I've ever said on this bored is still available on this bored. Your chance to expose me.
Go!
Just did, and it took two minutes. Original post is probably around as well.
 
Not obsessed with me at all. I'm going to be a little freaked out if Chrissy asks me to play Misty for her though.
Your idiocy, along with your pathological lies, does intrigue me, Greta.
When do you get your Daddy’s PERS windfall, big time lawyer?
Again, anything I've ever said on this bored is still available on this bored. Your chance to expose me.
Go!
Just did, and it took two minutes. Original post is probably around as well.
Still waiting
 
Ern has every talking point down pat
We can tax and regulate our way out. More nanny state will fix the previous nanny’s states errors.
The free market THRIVES under regulation.
You need to decide whether you're in favor of free market absolutism or capitalism. You can't have both and they're NOT the same thing.
Are there any non-PE majors on this bored?
Moral compass thinks he's smart
 
Ern has every talking point down pat
We can tax and regulate our way out. More nanny state will fix the previous nanny’s states errors.
The free market THRIVES under regulation.
You need to decide whether you're in favor of free market absolutism or capitalism. You can't have both and they're NOT the same thing.
Are there any non-PE majors on this bored?
Go on, explain the difference. In your own words.
 
Go on, explain the difference. In your own words.
The so-called attorney doesn’t even know the difference between federal courts and local/state courts. He wrote some vapid words attempting to differentiate two separate economic theories and he thought it sounded smart, though. He can’t explain it, but it’s a win for this pathetic guy.

What a loser.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top