New Bleenor Gem

jmc84

jmc84

Member
Phil made a poast about how too many people in the doogman prediction thread were underestimating our defense, and some guy responded with a stat backed poast on why he disagreed. Bleenor's response: "It was a statement, not a question.". Arrogant prick. Definitely going to be using that line, however.
 
Already made a thread about this last night.
Click to expand...

It was a statement, not a question.

Some of you need to learn the difference.
Click to expand...

Hard to read the difference when doing 90 on I-5 while doing blow off a hookers ass.
 
According to Bleenor, he has taken every single variable into consideration; the simpletons have not. That's why his analysis is infallible.
 
There was a short thread on doogman about ASJ being ready after his suspension and if he'll be in game shape. I told him to take it to the football board, this board is for discussing uniform combos, Dawgnews Dish threads and entrance themes. Twenty minutes later, I was being called an asshole, then the thread went poof.
 
There was a short thread on doogman about ASJ being ready after his suspension and if he'll be in game shape. I told him to take it to the football board, this board is for discussing uniform combos, Dawgnews Dish threads and entrance themes. Twenty minutes later, I was being called an asshole, then the thread went poof.
Click to expand...

If the people agree with Kim they can bash you all they want.

Now if you bash a doog you'll just be fucking gone, no warning.

 
According to Bleenor, he has taken every single variable into consideration; the simpletons have not. That's why his analysis is infallible.
Click to expand...

This sounds like "higher discussion" to me.
 
You people really have no idea of what you're talking about. I try to elevate the conversation here and all I get is grief from little people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top