Natural immunity....

Goduckies

Goduckies

Well-known poster
Standard Supporter
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
 
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
Click to expand...

Big pharma paydays are a bonus, but not the entire reason for all of this. Big pharma lobbied the government for money and the government likes the control. Win-win.

Natural immunity is real and shouldn’t have to be proven by anyone. Anyone who says otherwise is a fucking retard. Don’t cede ground and fall for the third group trap, existence of an emergency is on the government to prove. It goes away when people say it does. Starting Monday in King County, indoor dining and gyms require proof of submission to enter, not gonna be a hit in Fall City or Maple Valley.
 
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies[/i][/b] if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
Click to expand...

Disagree. You are protected the rest of your life.

20 years later they are showing that people who had SARS are protected from this.
 
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies[/i][/b] if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
Click to expand...

Disagree. You are protected the rest of your life.

20 years later they are showing that people who had SARS are protected from this.
Click to expand...

Corrrect. T cells offer additional, longer lasting protection, etc. Antibodies are not the only measure and might actually be the worst way to measure your protection. Wasn't there a 105 year old woman who recently died and was found to still have immune resistance to the Spanish flu?
 
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies[/i][/b] if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
Click to expand...

Disagree. You are protected the rest of your life.

20 years later they are showing that people who had SARS are protected from this.
Click to expand...

Corrrect. T cells offer additional, longer lasting protection, etc. Antibodies are not the only measure and might actually be the worst way to measure your protection. Wasn't there a 105 year old woman who recently died and was found to still have immune resistance to the Spanish flu?
Click to expand...

Fauci is looking into that. Get jabbed in the meantime.
 
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies[/i][/b] if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
Click to expand...

Disagree. You are protected the rest of your life.

20 years later they are showing that people who had SARS are protected from this.
Click to expand...

Yet people are getting covid multiple times
 
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies[/i][/b] if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
Click to expand...

Disagree. You are protected the rest of your life.

20 years later they are showing that people who had SARS are protected from this.
Click to expand...

Yet people are getting covid multiple times
Click to expand...

Given how "delinquent" the PCR test were, they might not have had actual CV the first tim. Or the second.

Or abundance.

 
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies[/i][/b] if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
Click to expand...

Disagree. You are protected the rest of your life.

20 years later they are showing that people who had SARS are protected from this.
Click to expand...

Yet people are getting covid multiple times
Click to expand...

Given how "delinquent" the PCR test were, they might not have had actual CV the first tim. Or the second.

Or abundance.
Click to expand...

For sure. To get my daughter back in daycare last month had to get her a negative test. Got her a rapid test on a Friday night at her pediatrician, came back positive. Pediatrician said she has seen many cases of what she suspected were false positives because of the sensitivity of their particular test and that other places were giving more negative ones on the same people in the same timeframes.

Next morning drove and got her a pcr test and another rapid test. Both came back negative within 12 hours of her postive one.
 
This is the big mistake on all this crap... natural immunity is real and should be looked at more. It's a 45 buck test to see if you still have antibodies[/i][/b] if you do, you are protected.... only issue is nothing for big pharma.
Click to expand...

Disagree. You are protected the rest of your life.

20 years later they are showing that people who had SARS are protected from this.
Click to expand...

Yet people are getting covid multiple times
Click to expand...

Even after 20 months reinfections are rare.

Show me data stating otherwise and change my opinion.
 
No clue of the data, I'm just going by what people in my uber have told me, at least 5 have got it twice..... they did obviously survive though.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top