My exchange with a "doog"

Passion

Passion

New Fish
So I'm sitting in my seat at a sports bar in DC after the Huskies just knocked off the traditional juggernaut - Illinois. There were a bunch of Husky Fans seated around me, and then I hear a comment over my left shoulder.

Doog: Our defense is awesome this year.

Passion: They look improved, but let's wait 'til they play arizona or oregon before we label them "awesome."

Doog (now annoyed): That's not fair. oregon is the best offensive team in the nation.

Passion: Isn't that how you measure whether you're "awesome?" By going against the best?

Doog doesn't make eye contact and stops engaging me.

This is the mentality that has been instilled - you're awesome when you beat up on inferior opponents. But it's acceptable to play poorly against good opponents because they're "the best in the nation."

This is how 7-6, 8-5, or even 9-4 becomes acceptable. This is the formula for NEVER winning another championship. You accept losing because...well..."a lot of teams lose to this school or that school."

Douchebags.
 
I like to give up 24 points to a mediocre-to-crappy offense and call my defense awesome. It's what I like to do.
 
So I'm sitting in my seat at a sports bar in DC after the Huskies just knocked off the traditional juggernaut - Illinois. There were a bunch of Husky Fans seated around me, and then I hear a comment over my left shoulder.

Doog: Our defense is awesome this year.

Passion: They look improved, but let's wait 'til they play arizona or oregon before we label them "awesome."

Doog (now annoyed): That's not fair. oregon is the best offensive team in the nation.

Passion: Isn't that how you measure whether you're "awesome?" By going against the best?

Doog doesn't make eye contact and stops engaging me.

This is the mentality that has been instilled - you're awesome when you beat up on inferior opponents. But it's acceptable to play poorly against good opponents because they're "the best in the nation."

This is how 7-6, 8-5, or even 9-4 becomes acceptable. This is the formula for NEVER winning another championship. You accept losing because...well..."a lot of teams lose to this school or that school."

Doogbags.
Click to expand...

 
Last edited:
I had an exchange with a football fan who went to the game. He was a Chicago native and went as a casual Illinois fan. His coments regarding UW: sloppy and undisciplined, usually a reflection of the coach.
 
I like to give up 24 points to a mediocre-to-crappy offense and call my defense awesome. It's what I like to do.
Click to expand...

To be fair, this moron was led to believe Nick Dolt was the best D Coordinator in the nation. Probably believed it.

 
My assessment:

Defense 1st half: B-
Defense 2nd half: D+

Doogbag grader: Awesome.

Mediocrity is the new awesome. 7-6 is awesome. Accept it, expect it; anywhere, anytime, anyone. Expect to win, if lesser opponent. Otherwise prepare to be plungered.

Don't see many lesser opponents remaining on the schedule after Idaho St.
 
Can I get a websters dictionary definition for 'doog' ?

Would it be

Doog ( dUUg) noun - One whom has blind faith in the UofW athletics regime and most recently would be exemplified by an in visual who believed Ty Willingham merely needed one more year.

 
Can I get a websters dictionary definition for 'doog' ?

Would it be

Doog ( dUUg) noun - One whom has blind faith in the UofW athletics regime and most recently would be exemplified by an in visual who believed Ty Willingham merely needed one more year.
Click to expand...

That's the commonly misused form of the term.

The REAL Doog is one whom is obsessed over Oregon football's status as superior to Washington football. Just like Coogs care more about seeing Washington suffer than they do about seeing Washington State succeed.

Hi Harv!
 
Can I get a websters dictionary definition for 'doog' ?

Would it be

Doog ( dUUg) noun - One whom has blind faith in the UofW athletics regime and most recently would be exemplified by an in visual who believed Ty Willingham merely needed one more year.
Click to expand...

Apparently it's a play on the word "coog," as in coogs that are satisfied with things like lots of offensive yards, dynamic WRs, and 7-6 or 8-5 records.

I needed to ask that question myself.
 
In visual = individual

Fucking telephone
Click to expand...

Perfect irony. No mistake, Willingham was an "In visual" for the UW administration. AD must have lost his fucking telephone since didn't flush that turd soon enough.

 
I used Doog on dawgman in a war with the 'new school' doogs who think I am ruining the board with my posts questioning where we are at and what might go wrong... I guess I burst the 'pink cloud' there... The thread was deleted because I used Doog. There is a new wave of doogs ... I think I will call them 'post modern doogs' .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top