More revisionist history....

Colonel_Angus

New Fish
Kim says he used to rip Ty all the time. Dave agrees.

Someone points out that he reported, he never ripped Ty until it was "cool" to do so.
 
If you point that out he'll ban you like he did @MonroeCougDad because Kim is a giant cunt like that.

Just like in a few years he'll claim he was hard on Sark and ripped on him all the time.

Lather, Rinse, Repeat.

FUCK YOU KIM! I know you are reading this so please get full blown AIDS next time Woodward fucks you in the ass.
 
If you point that out he'll ban you like he did @MonroeCougDad because Kim is a giant cunt like that.

Just like in a few years he'll claim he was hard on Sark and ripped on him all the time.

Lather, Rinse, Repeat.

FUCK YOU KIM! I know you are reading this so please get full blown AIDS next time Woodward fucks you in the ass.

I used to hang in chat when it was fun to fuck with people and I will say Kim said some pretty tame things regarding Ty. He was very careful to say it in chat only and by no means was he blasting Ty....things like "heard ______ booster wasn't happy about not getting into practice" and shit. I bet he even says he has a 9 inch cock

 
I still say only reason Kim didn't like Ty was due to lack of access nothing to do with his shitty record.

Even then he had a chance to turn up the heat on Ty and he refused to do that. Same with KJR. All these media fucks talk a good game but when we needed them they sat on their hands with regards to firing Ty after year three.

Fuck em!
 
Screen shots sent to Dickus. He said he was too busy trolling 50 cent hookers on Rainier Avenue to post them on the NW Fucktard site tonight. Said he will do it tomorrow. I say he lacks commitment to the cause.
 
Kim locked that thread to posting after people started pointing out the truth. Section14a is all up in there being a cunt too
 
Kim locked that thread to posting after people started pointing out the truth. Section14a is all up in there being a cunt too

So business as usual? lol.
 
What bullshit. On my end, I would send Fetters an article criticizing Tyrone or the AD, and then I would get a call from Kim to let me know that Dawgman wasn't running it because 1. The timing's not right or 2. Fetters will catch the brunt of this or 3. There seems to be some things happening behind the scenes that will lead to change, so let's sit on this awhile and see what happens.. or 4. DJ, this is just a bit strong and key people will take it the wrong way.... etc.
 
... and by the way, it was/is their website, so it's fine to run it anyway they wish. Just don't lie and change facts now to make yourself look better.
 
That's why I felt it was time to start archiving the nonsense. Otherwise it slides down the doogman memory/glory hole.

... and by the way, it was/is their website, so it's fine to run it anyway they wish. Just don't lie and change facts now to make yourself look better.

 
That's why I felt it was time to start archiving the nonsense. Otherwise it slides down the doogman memory/glory hole.

... and by the way, it was/is their website, so it's fine to run it anyway they wish. Just don't lie and change facts now to make yourself look better.

And please never stop. What you are doing is a public service to everyone who values honesty and accountability, aka the anti-Doogman.
 
Last edited:
... and by the way, it was/is their website, so it's fine to run it anyway they wish. Just don't lie and change facts now to make yourself look better.

And that sums up my entire problem with those guys. Being selective on how you run your business is completely understandable. Just have some consistency and integrity. I would have no issue with a statement like "Look we had to protect our access and ability to cover Husky football by carefully selecting our editorials". I would respect that. Denying that since is bullshit.

I don't know any of those guys personally, but I can't for the life of my understand why Samek turned over the keys to him.

 
Back
Top