Lost in the embarrassing meltdown last night

Goduckies said:
whlinder said:
WestlinnDuck said:
whlinder said:
So maybe I am missing something but why did Trump pull out of the JCPOA deal with Iran that Obama got through?
By all accounts Iran had ceased enrichment. And Iran should not have nukes. But kinda dumb that we had to bomb Iran for starting to make nukes after it was us who pulled out of the deal where Iran said they wouldn’t make nukes.
Click to expand...
By all accounts? You mean that Iran let in the IAEA inspectors to confirm that enrichment had ended? The head of the IAEA is from Argentina and reports to the UN. Hardly a friend to Israel and the US. So, you are missing a lot. Like everything. When your source is "By all accounts" you need to doubt your accounts. By all accounts covid came from a Wuhan wet market. By all accounts if you take the vaxx you can't get covid or spread it. Geezus.
=========
The https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=cb1934bd945b0a8e&rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS871US871&cs=0&sxsrf=AE3TifOj8yMcoqzrG4s5EJFpCG5SIHAgBg%3A1750612550382&q=International+Atomic+Energy+Agency&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiWqqv5w4WOAxXoHzQIHXCSANAQxccNegQIBBAB&mstk=AUtExfCyMav_MjqI5kOOm3zG4TrD8ie396uC8TKOnI1HZ9jc3lgGy5fQG4P4RQLa2EbrVMOVI-9D7XGtsywbeUHKtRHRFiW3Ccil8we0wvDhMYQ6ow2ixoWCRW5qDwi0cjj9uxh0LyLlW7-VbvBKIv05VV-_R55hyxTVQ3R0zeUgWXSsclput5bZ5J7FRiMEOI5bsg8kaVLFueItpr_jDx0kn8UTHsyPNjzpiwEQviYedoja2zswOXUVhpO2hHOCp3FxrtOPTLh16gCK3J6BwQg1Q4FY&csui=3 (IAEA) has reported that Iran has been enriching uranium to 60% purity at its Fordow facility, a level significantly higher than needed for civilian nuclear energy and close to weapons-grade material, according to reports. This increase in enrichment level has raised concerns among international observers, particularly given Iran's past nuclear activities and its ongoing tensions with the West. 
Click to expand...
Bloomberg. The Financial Times. Publications that, for most topics, I'm going to assume their reporting is not full of shit. Covid is a different topic and not relevant to the consideration of whether Iran was following the JCPOA. Plus I would hope that our spying capabilities would tell us what they were actually doing.
Comparing post-JCPOA withdrawal behavior of Iran enrichment to pre-withdrawal doesn't make sense. Sure they're enriching now. I'm questioning how we got here, after a major incentive to not enrich was removed.
Click to expand...
They enriched immediately with the cash they got from the JPOA
Click to expand...
Give me something more to read than an internet message bored poast plz
 
WestlinnDuck said:
Bloomberg is no different than CNN on the green gaia fraud, tariffs, Russia Russia, open borders, deportation and foreign policy if you want to know what is going on and is in the chicom bag. HTH. If you believe Iran and Bloomberg then you need to start pulling teeth and putting them under your pillow.
Click to expand...
OK!
I can't follow wtf half this message means but assuming it is something to say other sources are more reliable about world events than Bloomberg. Being skeptical of media is healthy, don't twist, but please share your trustworthy sources of information.
 
Goduckies said:
whlinder said:
WestlinnDuck said:
whlinder said:
So maybe I am missing something but why did Trump pull out of the JCPOA deal with Iran that Obama got through?
By all accounts Iran had ceased enrichment. And Iran should not have nukes. But kinda dumb that we had to bomb Iran for starting to make nukes after it was us who pulled out of the deal where Iran said they wouldn’t make nukes.
Click to expand...
By all accounts? You mean that Iran let in the IAEA inspectors to confirm that enrichment had ended? The head of the IAEA is from Argentina and reports to the UN. Hardly a friend to Israel and the US. So, you are missing a lot. Like everything. When your source is "By all accounts" you need to doubt your accounts. By all accounts covid came from a Wuhan wet market. By all accounts if you take the vaxx you can't get covid or spread it. Geezus.
=========
The https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=cb1934bd945b0a8e&rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS871US871&cs=0&sxsrf=AE3TifOj8yMcoqzrG4s5EJFpCG5SIHAgBg%3A1750612550382&q=International+Atomic+Energy+Agency&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiWqqv5w4WOAxXoHzQIHXCSANAQxccNegQIBBAB&mstk=AUtExfCyMav_MjqI5kOOm3zG4TrD8ie396uC8TKOnI1HZ9jc3lgGy5fQG4P4RQLa2EbrVMOVI-9D7XGtsywbeUHKtRHRFiW3Ccil8we0wvDhMYQ6ow2ixoWCRW5qDwi0cjj9uxh0LyLlW7-VbvBKIv05VV-_R55hyxTVQ3R0zeUgWXSsclput5bZ5J7FRiMEOI5bsg8kaVLFueItpr_jDx0kn8UTHsyPNjzpiwEQviYedoja2zswOXUVhpO2hHOCp3FxrtOPTLh16gCK3J6BwQg1Q4FY&csui=3 (IAEA) has reported that Iran has been enriching uranium to 60% purity at its Fordow facility, a level significantly higher than needed for civilian nuclear energy and close to weapons-grade material, according to reports. This increase in enrichment level has raised concerns among international observers, particularly given Iran's past nuclear activities and its ongoing tensions with the West. 
Click to expand...
Bloomberg. The Financial Times. Publications that, for most topics, I'm going to assume their reporting is not full of shit. Covid is a different topic and not relevant to the consideration of whether Iran was following the JCPOA. Plus I would hope that our spying capabilities would tell us what they were actually doing.
Comparing post-JCPOA withdrawal behavior of Iran enrichment to pre-withdrawal doesn't make sense. Sure they're enriching now. I'm questioning how we got here, after a major incentive to not enrich was removed.
Click to expand...
They enriched immediately with the cash they got from the JPOA
Click to expand...
Source on enrichment? Since that's my original post in this thread: Financial Times / Bloomberg and others shared that enrichment went away when the JCPOA went into affect. Would like to understand where they are wrong, since everyone in this place claims they are.
The cash was originally paid by Iran for US fighter jets in the 70s when it was an ally, which were never delivered after 1979 rolled around. Paying back the principal plus interest instead of possibly losing more in arbitration and to get a deal across the line was probably a good investment.
 
Who was going to collect the money?
Obama had 12 of the last 16 years. Doesn't really allow a 300 foot deep nuke site in the brief time Trump was on office
He ran on getting rid of a bad deal and he did. You may trust that Obama wanted to stop them
Many here find that to be hard to believe
 
It never made sense that a 45 year old debt that no one knew about had to be paid NOW
It was typical Obama bullshit to cover sending pallets of cash
Not even a bank transfer. Straight cash homie
 
The entitlement to the money was adjudicated. We intentionally chose not to transfer Iran the money in dollars is what I recall the cash being about.
 
HHusky said:
The entitlement to the money was adjudicated. We intentionally chose not to transfer Iran the money in dollars is what I recall the cash being about.
Click to expand...
And there was no reason to send pallets of cash is my recollection
Let them collect this alleged debt.
It wasn't with the mullahs anyway
Obama wanted to pay for terrorism and a nuke
 
So Iran takes American hostages for the better part of a year. Threatens to kill them every other day while condemning the USA and calling for its death.
45 years of calling for death to America. The largest exporter of terror on the planet.
Current regime in Iran wants the money back so they can invest it in more exportation of terror around the globe and reach their goal of getting a nuclear bomb so they can destroy Israel and kill millions of Jews maybe even attack the USA in the name of allah.
Democrats think it is a great idea to give them a couple billion. For some reason it makes democrat leadership all warm and fuzzy to do what commons sense says is the totally wrong thing to do.
Typical rat leadership. Let's reward them for 45 years of bad behavior!
It worked in N Korea right? We are big buddies now!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top