My favorite part is that he still refuses to single out players that are doing well... Sark used to go ON and ON and single out players doing well (mostly because he liked to here himself talk). Petersen refuses to do so.
I especially enjoyed it because Kim was the one that asked the question.
My favorite part is that he still refuses to single out players that are doing well... Sark used to go ON and ON and single out players doing well (mostly because he liked to here himself talk). Petersen refuses to do so.
I especially enjoyed it because Kim was the one that asked the question.
My favorite part is that he still refuses to single out players that are doing well... Sark used to go ON and ON and single out players doing well (mostly because he liked to here himself talk). Petersen refuses to do so.
I especially enjoyed it because Kim was the one that asked the question.
I hated this about Sark. I remember going into 2012, Sark was talking about how Keith Price is a great player and he has stepped up his game from his great 2011 season. A few months later, he's blaming Price for the team's problems to Kim in some coveted, off the record comments. He's called Kasen and ASJ great too, and said Ta'Amu was so dominant he was making it hard to practice. All of those guys are/were good players, but they surely were not dominant All American types. There was too much complacency during Sark's time, and I think his constant praising of players was a reason why.
My favorite part is that he still refuses to single out players that are doing well... Sark used to go ON and ON and single out players doing well (mostly because he liked to here himself talk). Petersen refuses to do so.
I especially enjoyed it because Kim was the one that asked the question.
I hated this about Sark. I remember going into 2012, Sark was talking about how Keith Price is a great player and he has stepped up his game from his great 2011 season. A few months later, he's blaming Price for the team's problems to Kim in some coveted, off the record comments. He's called Kasen and ASJ great too, and said Ta'Amu was so dominant he was making it hard to practice. All of those guys are/were good players, and they surely could've been dominant All American types. But there was too much complacency during Sark's time, and I think his constant praising of players was a reason why.
My favorite part is that he still refuses to single out players that are doing well... Sark used to go ON and ON and single out players doing well (mostly because he liked to here himself talk). Petersen refuses to do so.
I especially enjoyed it because Kim was the one that asked the question.
I hated this about Sark. I remember going into 2012, Sark was talking about how Keith Price is a great player and he has stepped up his game from his great 2011 season. A few months later, he's blaming Price for the team's problems to Kim in some coveted, off the record comments. He's called Kasen and ASJ great too, and said Ta'Amu was so dominant he was making it hard to practice. All of those guys are/were good players, but they surely were not dominant All American types. There was too much complacency during Sark's time, and I think his constant praising of players was a reason why.
Everything after "Sark" was TLDR.