Link to the Re-Rank Results is LIVE

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

New Fish
1drv.ms/1yXQA9k

There are three tabs for you to look at:

1. Form Responses: This shows how everyone voted in the re-rank. (we added a few players that didn't show up on campus and just gave them an automatic 0)
2. Data: This pools together all the numbers so you can see how many stars each player got.
3. Graphical Representation: This allows for you to click on individual players to see the pie chart of their star breakdown, or you can click on an entire class year to see a pie chart of the class as it is. (Please note, if you are clicking on a name and it is not showing information it means you are filtering by class. Simply clear that filter by clicking the little red "X" to the right of the word "player" or "class"; if you hover over the red X it should say "clear filter"

I will be writing an article tomorrow at some point, I hope to have it posted tomorrow evening. The data is really FREAKING depressing.

Anyways, enjoy the data. And I apologize for the abuse some out here (including myself) are about to receive from @Dennis_DeYoung‌.
 
Big time disagree with those that ranked Peters a 5. He had 5 talent. He never fully displayed that at Washington. He was an all-conference caliber as a sophomore. All-Conference to me is a 4. He could have been an All-American ... but he decided to get kicked off the team instead. Even if he was a 5-star in ability, I think you have to knock him down a bit for being a knucklehead.
 
Big time disagree with those that ranked Peters a 5. He had 5 talent. He never fully displayed that at Washington. He was an all-conference caliber as a sophomore. All-Conference to me is a 4. He could have been an All-American ... but he decided to get kicked off the team instead. Even if he was a 5-star in ability, I think you have to knock him down a bit for being a knucklehead.
Click to expand...

If I could have given him a 4.5 I would have. Thought the impact he made in the games he played was worth it.
 
I like how @claycha‌ gave Jesse Callier a 3 and Bishop a 4, wtf man?
Click to expand...

I like how he grouped Sean Parker, Kasen Williams and ASJ with Mike Criste, Greg Ducre, John Timu and Michael Hartvigson in 2 while Andrew Hudson and Jesse Callier a 3.

Good fucking god.
 
I like how @claycha‌ gave Jesse Callier a 3 and Bishop a 4, wtf man?
Click to expand...

I like how he grouped Sean Parker, Kasen Williams and ASJ with Mike Criste, Greg Ducre, John Timu and Michael Hartvigson in 2 while Andrew Hudson and Jesse Callier a 3.

Good fucking god.
Click to expand...

Yeah, he ranked guys down from the average by at least 1 point pretty consistently.
 
Average score given by each participant.

nmxpibg.jpg
 
I like how @claycha‌ gave Jesse Callier a 3 and Bishop a 4, wtf man?
Click to expand...

I like how he grouped Sean Parker, Kasen Williams and ASJ with Mike Criste, Greg Ducre, John Timu and Michael Hartvigson in 2 while Andrew Hudson and Jesse Callier a 3.

Good fucking god.
Click to expand...

Yeah, he ranked guys down from the average by at least 1 point pretty consistently.
Click to expand...

If that was the case, Hartvigson is a 0, Criste and Ducre are a 1, Timu, Hudson, and Callier are a 2, Parker and Williams are a 3, and ASJ is a 4.

@claycha 's points are Ektard retarded, no fucking excuses.
 
I get being a little stiff on the rankings, but being nearly .5 lower on average than the next closest is extreme.
 
Average score given by each participant.

nmxpibg.jpg
Click to expand...

I like how you got 5 decimals deep and decided, "screw it, add four more decimals!"
Click to expand...

gotta have those extra numbers mang

also... here is an unweighted variation of how far participants were from the average for each player (doesn't correct for standard deviation and other factors...)

Smaller number means closer to the average... on average.

NoccvGo.png


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top