Johnny Manziel: What Jake Locker could have been...

DerekJohnson

Administrator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
... had Sarkisian not tried to make him into a Dan Marino-style pocket passer.

Jake was every bit the same talent as a runner as Manziel and was bigger and stronger too.

Manziel's Cotton Bowl highlights.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agreed. I remember watching the Syracuse and Boise State games his first year and thinking the sky's the limit....
 
Jake was a much more accurate passer while on the run, than when parked in the pocket. Incidentally, he would still be having the same sub par NFL career regardless.
 
Jake was nowhere near the passer Manziel is, on the run or from the pocket. He also seemed to wilt in big situations. Locker, and I liked the guy, more often than not found ways to come up small when it counted.
 
If anyone in the NFL had half a brain they would go 0-16 next year, take Johnny football with the first pick in 14' draft and then hire Chip to pop off. SB baby.
 
3466F6EF00000578-3607435-image-a-60_1464121011647.jpg


J?
 
Jake was nowhere near the passer Manziel is, on the run or from the pocket. He also seemed to wilt in big situations. Locker, and I liked the guy, more often than not found ways to come up small when it counted[/b].

i respect your opinion, but i actually disagree on this based on Jake keeping us close with Ohio State single handedly, pulling that epic win against USC after he was crushed by Shareece Wright, and a few other games against Oregon, BYU and WSU. I personally think the "stepping up in big games wilting thing" is actually more a product of both Ty completely leaving Jake on his own while the rest of the team boycotted and then the Sark forcing everyone into a system that didn't align with Jake's skills. He rotted with us.
 
also at Notre Dame when he threw that straight arm and we lost after fucking up 8 plays in a row at the goal line. That wasn't Jake coming up small in my eyes.
 
Jake was nowhere near the passer Manziel is, on the run or from the pocket. He also seemed to wilt in big situations. Locker, and I liked the guy, more often than not found ways to come up small when it counted[/b].

i respect your opinion[/b], but i actually disagree on this based on Jake keeping us close with Ohio State single handedly, pulling that epic win against USC after he was crushed by Shareece Wright, and a few other games against Oregon, BYU and WSU. I personally think the "stepping up in big games wilting thing" is actually more a product of both Ty completely leaving Jake on his own while the rest of the team boycotted and then the Sark forcing everyone into a system that didn't align with Jake's skills. He rotted with us.

WTF? "I respect your opinion" on this bored?
 
Totally disagree. Manziel can actually throw the ball with competence and accuracy:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/player/_/id/517475/johnny-manziel

Jack Lockner was never remotely close to that efficiency as a passer.

Boobs please come back d00d, we need you now more than ever!

i respect your opinion, but i actually disagree on this based on Jake keeping us close with Ohio State single handedly, pulling that epic win against USC after he was crushed by Shareece Wright, and a few other games against Oregon, BYU and WSU. I personally think the "stepping up in big games wilting thing" is actually more a product of both Ty completely leaving Jake on his own while the rest of the team boycotted and then the Sark forcing everyone into a system that didn't align with Jake's skills. He rotted with us.
 
Jake was nowhere near the passer Manziel is, on the run or from the pocket. He also seemed to wilt in big situations. Locker, and I liked the guy, more often than not found ways to come up small when it counted[/b].

i respect your opinion, but i actually disagree on this based on Jake keeping us close with Ohio State single handedly, pulling that epic win against USC after he was crushed by Shareece Wright, and a few other games against Oregon, BYU and WSU. I personally think the "stepping up in big games wilting thing" is actually more a product of both Ty completely leaving Jake on his own while the rest of the team boycotted and then the Sark forcing everyone into a system that didn't align with Jake's skills. He rotted with us.

Agree. He shit the bed against Nebraska twice (they shit it worse the second time). He never really did aside from those games though. He was never a good quarterback, but wasn't any worse in the clutch than out of it. Could be argued that he stepped up a bit.

Sark > Ty statement...Locker came up with more big plays in tight games than our current QB has (anything is more than zero, I know).
 
Jake was nowhere near the passer Manziel is, on the run or from the pocket. He also seemed to wilt in big situations. Locker, and I liked the guy, more often than not found ways to come up small when it counted[/b].

i respect your opinion, but i actually disagree on this based on Jake keeping us close with Ohio State single handedly, pulling that epic win against USC after he was crushed by Shareece Wright, and a few other games against Oregon, BYU and WSU. I personally think the "stepping up in big games wilting thing" is actually more a product of both Ty completely leaving Jake on his own while the rest of the team boycotted and then the Sark forcing everyone into a system that didn't align with Jake's skills. He rotted with us.

Agree. He shit the bed against Nebraska twice (they shit it worse the second time). He never really did aside from those games though. He was never a good quarterback, but wasn't any worse in the clutch than out of it. Could be argued that he stepped up a bit.

Sark > Ty statement...Locker came up with more big plays in tight games than our current QB has (anything is more than zero, I know).

Agreed. Locker had many issues. Shrinking back from the moment wasn't one of them.
 
Back
Top