It's official -- Mora needs more time

Yes. Every new coach gets at least three years to prove themselves.

We told you faggots ($75k) back in August that UCLA was going 8-4 or 9-3 this year.

Next year is the shot for UCLA to be special.
 
I actually bought into the magical holiday bowl run Sark's second year. He had his chance to be special his third year but didn't
 
I actually bought into the magical holiday bowl run Sark's second year. He had his chance to be special his third year but didn't
Click to expand...

Despite the blowouts with winning the Holiday Bowl I thought perhaps Sark might turn it around.

After the Oregon State loss in 2011 I was convinced he needed to go.
 
Its helps if you know something about football in evaluating coaches
Click to expand...

I know that losing to Furd by 3 isn't as bad as losing to them by 14, and that beating them once in a two year span is better than losing to them 3 times.

We agree Sark needs to go. I'm just not convinced Mora is the guy to replace him.
 
Next year is the shot for UCLA to be special.
Click to expand...

Next year is always special.

But we need a replacement for Sark now.
Click to expand...

Where were you asking for Sark to be fired after his second year?
Click to expand...

I was never in favor of hiring another school's OC for a tryout as a HC.
Click to expand...
That is it in a nutshell. Had nothing against Sark except that he should break himself in as an HC somewhere else.

5 years in this pathetic analysis of Sark is painfully obvious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top