I know they put out a lot of worthless and idiotic analysis, but these might be the worst.
Is There Anything More Worthless Than a Dawgman Impact Report?
- Thread starter RoadDawg55
- Start date
Is There Anything More Worthless Than a Dawgman Impact Report? Yes there is. A paid subscription to that site.
jecornel
New Fish
If you follow the logic of the legendary Dick Baird you won't know anything about the players you recruited for two or three years. Impact report sounds like a puff piece?
I did notice that dm.cm still has the old site operating. I thought that technology was 10 years old and new one would be up by now. What's the problem?
I did notice that dm.cm still has the old site operating. I thought that technology was 10 years old and new one would be up by now. What's the problem?
Although it is fun to look back and see the "impact report" for guys like Scott Lawyer and Nathan Dean. Surprisingly, it doesn't say "since he chose UW over Cal Poly, he should serve well as a backup on the scout team" or "we anticipate this player quitting before stepping on the field for a snap".
I also recently discovered that all the recruiting blogs featuring Scott's predictions on Jack, Vanderdoes, Falah, etc. Have been deleted
I also recently discovered that all the recruiting blogs featuring Scott's predictions on Jack, Vanderdoes, Falah, etc. Have been deleted
That is why they are so worthless. Any highly rated recruit is a big time get who should force his way into playing time right away. Every 2 or 3 star prospect is raw and needs a couple years with Ivan, but will be a good player by their redshirt junior year.
Last edited:
CuntWaffle
New Fish
Better question is why are you a subscriber?
chrisvashon
New Fish
Has there ever been a negative "impact report"? My sense is no. Recruiting expert Fatters somehow misses all the busts.
I confess I only read a couple before I realized I dngaf what this fat looser thinks... about anything.
I confess I only read a couple before I realized I dngaf what this fat looser thinks... about anything.
Last edited:
chrisvashon
New Fish
Until this place talks REAL football and teenage boy stalking, dawgman has a place. Roaddawg, passion, heretobeatmychest - actually doing a decent job at bringing substance. Hope they keep it up.
I'm not.
IrishDawg22
New Fish
Yeah, the impact reports of Myles Jack, Max Browne, Braden Kearsley, and Mattingly were all pretty negative. They must really suck; some character issues there as well. That OL named Harlow initially had a positive impact report, but then it was reported that he was nothing special. Not sure what happened there. The opposite was true for Enewally. Originally he was not projected to have a positive impact, but then at the last minute, he ended up getting a very glowing review by the staff. Again, I'm not sure what happened but I'm sure there wasn't any kind of bias going on.
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
It's awfully warm out for late August.
greenblood
New Fish
You guys need to stop with the negativity!!!! Recruits read this board