so far so good...looked good vs. Dumbver starters. Kearse had a k.o. return for td. Wilson made some Lockner dumbass throws..guess Hugh and I are raycissst
They actually had 6 passing plays. The 10 yard penalty was on a pass play. Anyone that has watched more than 5 minutes of football in their life could see that the passing game carried them on the first drive as well as the next 3. They had 21yds on 4 carries on the first drive. 4yds per play isn't bad, but not up to Hawk standards.
It's actually a good thing. Their passing game is much more advanced than it was this time last year. Even at the end of last year they often started games throwing the ball, then running later. The playoff games showed this trend.
You are trying real hard to show them as a run to set up the pass team. Not sure why you are trying so hard. Nothing wrong with them being an equally balanced offense.
They actually had 6 passing plays. The 10 yard penalty was on a pass play. Anyone that has watched more than 5 minutes of football in their life could see that the passing game carried them on the first drive as well as the next 3. They had 21yds on 4 carries on the first drive. 4yds per play isn't bad, but not up to Hawk standards.
It's actually a good thing. Their passing game is much more advanced than it was this time last year. Even at the end of last year they often started games throwing the ball, then running later. The playoff games showed this trend.
You are trying real hard to show them as a run to set up the pass team. Not sure why you are trying so hard. Nothing wrong with them being an equally balanced offense.
What part of "The Seahawks ran a balance attack plus played great attacking defense and had good play from their special teams return games" didn't you understand?
I said they ran a balance offense.
They actually had 6 passing plays. The 10 yard penalty was on a pass play. Anyone that has watched more than 5 minutes of football in their life could see that the passing game carried them on the first drive as well as the next 3. They had 21yds on 4 carries on the first drive. 4yds per play isn't bad, but not up to Hawk standards.
It's actually a good thing. Their passing game is much more advanced than it was this time last year. Even at the end of last year they often started games throwing the ball, then running later. The playoff games showed this trend.
You are trying real hard to show them as a run to set up the pass team. Not sure why you are trying so hard. Nothing wrong with them being an equally balanced offense.
What part of "The Seahawks ran a balance attack plus played great attacking defense and had good play from their special teams return games" didn't you understand?
I said they ran a balance offense.
Not even close to what you said. You tried to emphasize running the ball and didn't mention a "balanced attack". Nice back pedal. Sherman has nothing on you.
"play great offense with running the ball"
so far so good...looked good vs. Dumbver starters. Kearse had a k.o. return for td. Wilson made some Lockner dumbass throws..guess Hugh and I are raycissst
Pete never had to deal with 0-12...
Pete never had to deal with 0-12...
I've always thought Pete inherited a bigger mess than Sark did at UW. That roster that Pete inherited was fucking terrible.
Sark's roster wasn't as bad as people want to make it out to be.