Hugh Millen just torched Kawasaki

jecornel

jecornel

New Fish
Said, in all his years playing and watching football he has never seen a defensive scheme like Kawasaki's. On the two deep touchdown passes,he has never ever seen a scheme drawn up like that. Sounds like Kent Baer territory.

I guess we are learning how Kawasaki took a top a to 15 defense at Boise to 88th in no time.

Coach Pete isn't the only one burning bridges right Fetters?????????
 
Last edited:
Hugh Millen is your source?

And the ole blame the assistants games is straight out of the doog playbook.
 
As far as I'm concerned Kawasaki could not get enough criticism. That was one of the most FS defensive gameplans you'll ever see.
 
Hugh Millen is your source?

And the ole blame the assistants games is straight out of the doog playbook.
Click to expand...

Must be why Saban told Nussmeier to 'explore other opportunities'. When you have the right HC it's appropriate to criticize the assistants.
 
Last edited:
it's the old broken clock. Every once in a while Hugh and even doogs can be right.

LIFPO, but to assume that someone is wrong just because they are a doog is flawed thinking.

Nothing is straight black and white in this world.

(Yes, it's always about the blacks.)
 
There was a commercial on 710 flipped over to Mitch, and Mitch was going on about how there is no way Wilcox would have allowed 52pts against Eastern and then Hugh broke down Kawasaki's game plan saying he had never seen anything remotely like it.
 
And right before that Hugh was talking about the Ray Rice video and how it didn't *really* look like he meant to punch her out, more like his arm flew up in self defense and she fell into it. He's on a roll.
 
Hugh Millen is your source?

And the ole blame the assistants games is straight out of the doog playbook.
Click to expand...

Must be why Saban told Nussmeier to 'explore other opportunities'. When you have the right HC it's appropriate to criticize the assistants.
Click to expand...
The fuck does that have to do with anything, if Peterman wants to fire Twatkowski I'm all for it. Until he does Pete takes the blame for Twat's mistakes.

 
I love the criticism...because it's accurate. No fucking adjustments all game long. With a front-seven like ours, we should be able to do a better job masking the inexperience of three fucking DBs.

How can people disagree with this? Even Petersen said it's on the coaches: “We got to put the tape on first to really see what the heck went on and where our technique isn’t right. The first thing is, we’ve got to clean up some discipline things, without question. And then look at our scheme — hey are we putting our guys in the best chance possible to make plays or asking them to do something they can’t do? It always starts with us coaches; there’s no putting it on (them) — they gotta do this, they gotta do that. It’s starts with us, and we will. We’ll put it on our shoulders and analyze it and try to figure out how to put our guys in the best positions to make plays.” (from the Tacoma News Tribune blog.)

So far, kawasaki tongue's bag.
 
Youre actually quite a bit off the mark here.
Millen defended Twatkowski for the most part. Said that Adams was throwing perfect passes on all of those and talked about how all the guys who got beat (except for Peters) were in their first 2 years in the program. When Mitch made the point about Wilcox Millen said "yeah but they'd be in year 3 of his schemes. These guys are in game 2". If anything, Millen was in apologist mode towards Coach Twat (probably because he's white.
 
Youre actually quite a bit off the mark here.
Millen defended Twatkowski for the most part. Said that Adams was throwing perfect passes on all of those and talked about how all the guys who got beat (except for Peters) were in their first 2 years in the program. When Mitch made the point about Wilcox Millen said "yeah but they'd be in year 3 of his schemes. These guys are in game 2". If anything, Millen was in apologist mode towards Coach Twat (probably because he's white.
Click to expand...
Fuck me. Cornel was my source????
 
Last edited:
I love the criticism...because it's accurate. No fucking adjustments all game long. With a front-seven like ours, we should be able to do a better job masking the inexperience of three fucking DBs.

How can people disagree with this? Even Petersen said it's on the coaches: “We got to put the tape on first to really see what the heck went on and where our technique isn’t right. The first thing is, we’ve got to clean up some discipline things, without question. And then look at our scheme — hey are we putting our guys in the best chance possible to make plays or asking them to do something they can’t do? It always starts with us coaches; there’s no putting it on (them) — they gotta do this, they gotta do that. It’s starts with us, and we will. We’ll put it on our shoulders and analyze it and try to figure out how to put our guys in the best positions to make plays.” (from the Tacoma News Tribune blog.)

So far, kawasaki tongue's bag.
Click to expand...
Of course it's on the coaches*. Pete hired the coaches. Ergo, it's on Pete.

*I never blame the kids.
 
How about the fact that coach K doesn't have the experience of Ducre, Shamburger, and Parker back there to feel confident about so that he can dial up whatever the fuck he wants? I'm not saying he did a great job but jesus christ, think about the liabilities we had back there against a really good quarterback. The Huskies were trying to get everybody playing time except Lindquist/Williams and the fucking waterboy.
 
banana and blondes, I never heard that part....Are you Hugh? There was no defending from what I heard.

Section 8 - yes I was cringing when he was talking about Ray Rice.
 
So what was the scheme that was so whack-a-do?
Click to expand...

It was a scheme great for shallow crosses, but when you have 8 guys at your disposal because of 3 d-lineman, the scheme provided no safety help and it was a press coverage. Vern saw that and roasted the DB's. Essentially he said with 8 guys in the back end that was a crazy scheme to offer no help to the DB's. That's what I got out of it. I think Banana would call me a twister.

 
Said, in all his years playing and watching football he has never seen a defensive scheme like Kawasaki's. On the two deep touchdown passes,he has never ever seen a scheme drawn up like that. Sounds like Kent Baer territory.

I guess we are learning how Kawasaki took a top a to 15 defense at Boise to 88th in no time.

Coach Pete isn't the only one burning bridges right Fetters?????????
Click to expand...

I guess he didn't watch the Holt defense?
 
There was a commercial on 710 flipped over to Mitch, and Mitch was going on about how there is no way Wilcox would have allowed 52pts against Eastern and then Hugh broke down Kawasaki's game plan saying he had never seen anything remotely like it.
Click to expand...

UW had 50 + points laid on them 3 times and 40+ 3 times under Wilcox. Not defending Kulamgowski, but the hero worship of Wilcox is a bit much.
 
How about the fact that coach K doesn't have the experience of Ducre, Shamburger, and Parker back there to feel confident about so that he can dial up whatever the fuck he wants? I'm not saying he did a great job but jesus christ, think about the liabilities we had back there against a really good quarterback. The Huskies were trying to get everybody playing time except Lindquist/Williams and the fucking waterboy.
Click to expand...

Sounds like we are so fucking young....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top